Hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section - Left lateral position vs. tilted supine position

被引:56
作者
Mendonca, C
Griffiths, J
Ateleanu, B
Collis, RE
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Walsgarave Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Royal Gwent Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Newport NPT 2VB, Gwent, Wales
关键词
anaesthesia; obstetric; anaesthetic techniques; combined spinal-epidural; complications; hypotension; surgery; Caesarean section;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03090.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Eighty-seven pregnant mothers undergoing elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated either to the full left lateral position (n = 45) or to the supine position with 12degrees left lateral tilt (n = 42) after a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) in the sitting position and an initial 2 min in the full right lateral position. Fewer mothers were hypotensive while in the study position [29 (64%) in lateral group vs. 38 (90%) in the tilted supine group; p = 0.03]. Mothers in the lateral group tended to become hypotensive after turning them back to the tilted supine position immediately before surgery; hence the number of mothers who were hypotensive from the insertion of the CSE until delivery were similar [36 (80%) vs. 38 (90%)]. Mothers in the lateral group needed a lower dose of ephedrine to treat their hypotension while in their study position {median (interquartile range [range]) 6 (0-12 [0-36]) mg vs. 12 (6-18 [0-36]) mg, respectively; p = 0.04} but ephedrine requirements were similar overall {12 (6-12 [0-36]) mg vs. 12 (6-18 [0-36]) mg}, respectively. The full left lateral position reduces the incidence of early hypotension compared with the tilted supine position with tilt, and makes it easier to treat.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 431
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Bamber JH, 2000, INT J OBSTET ANESTH, V9, P197
[2]   AORTOCAVAL COMPRESSION BY UTERUS IN LATE HUMAN PREGNANCY .2. AN ARTERIOGRAPHIC STUDY [J].
BIENIARZ, J ;
CROTTOGI.JJ ;
CURUCHET, E ;
ROMEROSA.G ;
YOSHIDA, T ;
POSEIRO, JJ ;
CALDEYRO.R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1968, 100 (02) :203-&
[3]  
CARRIE LES, 1989, ANAESTHESIA, V44, P444
[4]   Evaluation of S1 motor block to determine a safe, reliable test dose for epidural analgesia [J].
Daoud, Z ;
Collis, RE ;
Ateleanu, B ;
Mapleson, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (03) :442-445
[5]   AORTOCAVAL COMPRESSION AND UTERINE DISPLACEMENT [J].
ECKSTEIN, KL ;
MARX, GF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1974, 40 (01) :92-96
[6]  
GOODLIN RC, 1971, OBSTET GYNECOL, V37, P698
[7]   Effect of lateral versus supine wedged position on development of spinal blockade and hypotension [J].
Hartley, H ;
Seed, PT ;
Ashworth, H ;
Kubli, M ;
O'Sullivan, G ;
Reynolds, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2001, 10 (03) :182-188
[8]   Comparison of measured and estimated angles of table tilt at Caesarean section [J].
Jones, SJ ;
Kinsella, SM ;
Donald, FA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (01) :86-87
[9]  
KERR MG, 1964, BRIT MED J, V1, P532
[10]   AORTIC COMPRESSION BY THE UTERUS - IDENTIFICATION WITH THE FINAPRES DIGITAL ARTERIAL-PRESSURE INSTRUMENT [J].
KINSELLA, SM ;
WHITWAM, JG ;
SPENCER, JAD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (08) :700-705