Development and validation of a most-probable-number-immunomagnetic separation methodology of enumerating Escherichia coli O157 in cattle feces

被引:10
作者
Stephens, T. P.
Loneragan, G. H.
Chaney, W. E.
Branham, L. A.
Brashears, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Int Ctr Food Ind Excellence, Dept Anim & Food Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] W Texas State Univ, Div Agr, Canyon, TX 79016 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-70.5.1072
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A method to validate enumeration of Escherichia coli O157 in fecal samples from feedlot cattle was developed in these studies. Due to background flora, bovine fecal sample enumeration cannot be performed by simple direct plating techniques. Known quantities of E. coli O157:H7 were inoculated into feces, and populations were determined by direct plating of the cocktail (studies 1, 2, and 3) and manure and cocktail (studies 4 and 5) mixtures and compared with a most-probable-number (MPN)-immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method. The three-tube MPN combined preenrichment in gram-negative broth with confirmation using IMS. Five separate enumeration studies (study 1, sterile feces inoculated with 10(2) E. coli O157:H7 per g; study 2, nonsterile feces inoculated with 10(3) E. coli O157:H7 per g; study 3, nonsterile feces inoculated with 10(1) E. coli O157:H7 per g; study 4, sterile feces inoculated with 10(4) streptomycin-resistant E. coli O157:H7 per g; and study 5, sterile feces inoculated with 10(2) streptomycin-resistant E. coli O157:H7 per g) were conducted. These studies were performed to determine the precision, accuracy, and specificity at low and high levels of pathogen contamination in feces, using direct plating compared with the MPN-IMS methodology tested. There was an overall difference (P < 0.01) between direct plating and MPN-IMS methodologies, but this difference was biologically negligible due to the difference in least-squares means (0.29 +/- 0.10) being so low. The direct plating and MPN-IMS methods were correlated (r = 0.93). These results suggest that using the MPN-IMS procedures is an effective method of estimating E. coli O157 populations in naturally infected bovine fecal samples.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1075
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alali WQ, 2004, J ANIM SCI, V82, P2148
[2]   Isolation, selection, and characterization of lactic acid bacteria for a competitive exclusion product to reduce shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle [J].
Brashears, MM ;
Jaroni, D ;
Trimble, J .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2003, 66 (03) :355-363
[3]   Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and sheep at slaughter, on beef and lamb carcasses and in raw beef and lamb products in South Yorkshire, UK [J].
Chapman, PA ;
Malo, ATC ;
Ellin, M ;
Ashton, R ;
Harkin, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 64 (1-2) :139-150
[4]   ESTIMATION OF BACTERIAL DENSITIES BY MEANS OF THE MOST PROBABLE NUMBER [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1950, 6 (02) :105-116
[5]  
Curiale M., 2004, MPN CALCULATOR
[6]   Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides, and carcasses of beef cattle during processing [J].
Elder, RO ;
Keen, JE ;
Siragusa, GR ;
Barkocy-Gallagher, GA ;
Koohmaraie, M ;
Laegreid, WW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (07) :2999-3003
[7]   Enumeration of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle faeces using most probable number technique and automated immunomagnetic separation [J].
Fegan, N ;
Higgs, G ;
Vanderlinde, P ;
Desmarchelier, P .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 38 (01) :56-59
[8]  
Fox JT, 2006, J ANIM SCI, V84, P250
[9]   Multiple sources of Escherichia coli O157 in feedlots and dairy farms in the northwestern USA [J].
Hancock, DD ;
Besser, TE ;
Rice, DH ;
Ebel, ED ;
Herriott, DE ;
Carpenter, LV .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1998, 35 (01) :11-19
[10]   Fecal shedding and rumen growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fasted calves [J].
Harmon, BG ;
Brown, CA ;
Tkalcic, S ;
Mueller, POE ;
Parks, A ;
Jain, AV ;
Zhao, T ;
Doyle, MP .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1999, 62 (06) :574-579