The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: Toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders

被引:172
作者
Maryn, Youri [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
De Bodt, Marc [4 ,5 ]
Roy, Nelson [6 ]
机构
[1] Sint Jan Gen Hosp, Dept Speech Language Pathol & Audiol, B-8000 Brugge, Belgium
[2] Sint Jan Gen Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, B-8000 Brugge, Belgium
[3] Univ Coll Ghent, Fac Hlth Care Vesalius, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Dept Speech Language Pathol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[5] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Dept Commun Disorders, Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
BREATHY VOCAL QUALITY; DYSPHONIA SEVERITY; PATHOLOGICAL VOICE; CONTINUOUS SPEECH; SUSTAINED VOWELS; CONNECTED SPEECH; PARAMETERS; RELIABILITY; TASK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Voice practitioners require an objective index of dysphonia severity as a means to reliably track treatment outcomes. To ensure ecological validity however, such a measure should survey both sustained vowels and continuous speech. In an earlier study, a multivariate acoustic model referred to as the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), consisting of a weighted combination of 6 time-, frequency- and quefrency-domain metrics, was developed to measure dysphonia severity in both speaking tasks. In the current investigation, the generalizability and clinical utility of the AVQI are evaluated by first assessing its external cross-validity and then determining its sensitivity to change in dysphonia severity following surgical and/or behavioral voice treatment. The results, based upon a new set of normal and disordered voices compared favorably with outcomes reported earlier, indicating acceptable external validity. Furthermore, the AVQI was sensitive to treatment-related changes, validating its role as a potentially robust and objective voice treatment outcomes measure. Learning outcomes: Readers will be able to: (1) explain methodological issues surrounding the development of voice treatment outcomes measures (such as external cross-validity and responsiveness to change), (2) appreciate the relevance of measuring dysphonia severity in both sustained vowels and connected speech, (3) describe the method of obtaining the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), (4) appreciate differences among a variety of estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and (5) discuss the AVQI as a clinically valid treatment outcomes measure. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 174
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INVESTIGATING COMMUN
[2]   SPEECH WAVE-FORM PERTURBATION ANALYSIS - A PERCEPTUAL ACOUSTICAL COMPARISON OF 7 MEASURES [J].
ASKENFELT, AG ;
HAMMARBERG, B .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1986, 29 (01) :50-64
[3]   Outcomes Measurement in Voice Disorders: Application of an Acoustic Index of Dysphonia Severity [J].
Awan, Shaheen N. ;
Roy, Nelson .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2009, 52 (02) :482-499
[4]   Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: A four-factor acoustic model [J].
Awan, SN ;
Roy, N .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2006, 20 (01) :35-49
[5]  
Buder E.H., 2000, VOICE QUALITY MEASUR, P119
[6]   The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality [J].
Carding, PN ;
Steen, IN ;
Webb, A ;
Mackenzie, K ;
Deary, IJ ;
Wilson, JA .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 29 (05) :538-544
[7]   The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation [J].
Chan, KMK ;
Yiu, EML .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2002, 45 (01) :111-126
[8]  
Davis SB., 1979, SPEECH LANGUAGE ADV, V1, P271, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-608601-0.50010-3
[9]  
DEBODT M, 1997, THESIS U ANTWERP ANT
[10]  
Dejonckere PH, 1996, Advances in Clinical Phonetics, P217