Why the Best Interest Standard Is Not Self-Defeating, Too Individualistic, Unknowable, Vague or Subjective

被引：12

作者：

Kopelman, Loretta M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] East Carolina Univ, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA

来源：

关键词：

THRESHOLD;

D O I：

10.1080/15265161.2018.1485768

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：34 / 36

页数：3

共 9 条

[1] [Anonymous], AM J BIOETHICS
[2] Beauchamp TL, 2013, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, P173
[3] BUCHANAN AE, 1990, DECIDING OTHERS, pCH2
[4] Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention
Diekema, DS
[J]. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2004, 25 (04) : 243 - 264
[5] Kopelman LM, 1997, J MED PHILOS, V22, P271
[6] Using the best interests standard to decide whether to test children for untreatable, late-onset genetic diseases
Kopelman, Loretta M.
[J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2007, 32 (04): : 375 - 394
[7] Pellegrino EdmundD., 1988, For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care
[8] Is the Best Interest Standard Good for Pediatrics?
Rhodes, Rosamond
Holzman, Ian R.
[J]. PEDIATRICS, 2014, 134 : S121 - S129
[9] When Parents Refuse: Resolving Entrenched Disagreements Between Parents and Clinicians in Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity
Winters, Janine Penfield
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (08) : 20 - 31