Why the Best Interest Standard Is Not Self-Defeating, Too Individualistic, Unknowable, Vague or Subjective

被引:12
作者
Kopelman, Loretta M. [1 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
THRESHOLD;
D O I
10.1080/15265161.2018.1485768
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 36
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM J BIOETHICS
[2]  
Beauchamp TL, 2013, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, P173
[3]  
BUCHANAN AE, 1990, DECIDING OTHERS, pCH2
[4]   Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention [J].
Diekema, DS .
THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2004, 25 (04) :243-264
[5]  
Kopelman LM, 1997, J MED PHILOS, V22, P271
[6]   Using the best interests standard to decide whether to test children for untreatable, late-onset genetic diseases [J].
Kopelman, Loretta M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2007, 32 (04) :375-394
[7]  
Pellegrino EdmundD., 1988, For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care
[8]   Is the Best Interest Standard Good for Pediatrics? [J].
Rhodes, Rosamond ;
Holzman, Ian R. .
PEDIATRICS, 2014, 134 :S121-S129
[9]   When Parents Refuse: Resolving Entrenched Disagreements Between Parents and Clinicians in Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity [J].
Winters, Janine Penfield .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (08) :20-31