Power matrix and dynamic response of the hybrid Wavestar-DeepCwind platform under different diameters and regular wave conditions

被引:38
作者
Ghafari, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Ghassemi, Hassan [1 ]
Neisi, Atefeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Maritime Engn, Marine & Hydrokinet Energy Grp, 424 Hafez Ave,POB 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Hybrid Wavestar-DeepCwind; Wavestar diameter; Power and CWR matrix; Heave response motion; DeepCwind natural periods; FLOATING WIND TURBINE; PERFORMANCE; SPAR; SYSTEM; VALIDATION; DESIGN; FORCE; MODEL; TLP;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110734
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Power production assessment usually carried out as a power matrix, is essential for the appraisal of wave energy converter (WEC) technologies. This article proposes the hybrid Wavestar-DeepCwind platform, which is composed of Wavestar WEC and a floating wind turbine to evaluate the power matrix under different regular wave conditions and different Wavestar diameters. Firstly, the effects of the Wavestar diameter and power take-off (PTO) damping coefficient on the absorbed power of a single Wavestar placed on the fixed point are investigated using the potential flow-based boundary element method (BEM). Secondly, considering the opti-mum PTO damping coefficient, the effect of Wavestar diameter on the total absorbed power was found. Finally, numerical simulation is extended for different wave periods and wave heights to estimate the total power matrix and the capture width ratio (CWR) matrix under different diameters. According to the numerical results, it is indicated that the maximum absorbed power and maximum CWR are obtained around the wave periods (T = 5s and T = 6s) for all wave heights (H = 1~4m) and Wavestar diameters (D = 5-10m). The heave response of the DeepCwind and three Wavestars (WS1 (or WS3) and WS2) in frequency domains are presented and discussed at various conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Evaluation of internal force superposition on a TLP for wind turbines
    Adam, Frank
    Myland, Thomas
    Schuldt, Burkhard
    Grossmann, Jochen
    Dahlhaus, Frank
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 71 : 271 - 275
  • [2] American Petroleum Institute, 1989, RECOMMENDED PRACTICE, V2
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, ISCOT DEV FIXED FLOA
  • [4] Aubault A, 2011, OMAE2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, VOL 5, P235
  • [5] Design considerations for tension leg platform wind turbines
    Bachynski, Erin E.
    Moan, Torgeir
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2012, 29 (01) : 89 - 114
  • [6] Bachynski Erin E., 2013, P ASME 32 INT C OCEA, V8
  • [7] Barltrop N. D., 1998, FLOATING STRUCTURES, V1
  • [8] Wave energy extraction and hydroelastic response reduction of modular floating breakwaters as array wave energy converters integrated into a very large floating structure
    Cheng, Yong
    Xi, Chen
    Dai, Saishuai
    Ji, Chunyan
    Collu, Maurizio
    Li, Mingxin
    Yuan, Zhiming
    Incecik, Atilla
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 306
  • [9] Power performance and dynamic responses of a combined floating vertical axis wind turbine and wave energy converter concept
    Cheng, Zhengshun
    Wen, Ting Rui
    Ong, Muk Chen
    Wang, Kai
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 171 : 190 - 204
  • [10] Validation of a FAST semi-submersible floating wind turbine numerical model with DeepCwind test data
    Coulling, Alexander J.
    Goupee, Andrew J.
    Robertson, Amy N.
    Jonkman, Jason M.
    Dagher, Habib J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 5 (02)