Power matrix and dynamic response of the hybrid Wavestar-DeepCwind platform under different diameters and regular wave conditions

被引:43
作者
Ghafari, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Ghassemi, Hassan [1 ]
Neisi, Atefeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Maritime Engn, Marine & Hydrokinet Energy Grp, 424 Hafez Ave,POB 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Hybrid Wavestar-DeepCwind; Wavestar diameter; Power and CWR matrix; Heave response motion; DeepCwind natural periods; FLOATING WIND TURBINE; PERFORMANCE; SPAR; SYSTEM; VALIDATION; DESIGN; FORCE; MODEL; TLP;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110734
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Power production assessment usually carried out as a power matrix, is essential for the appraisal of wave energy converter (WEC) technologies. This article proposes the hybrid Wavestar-DeepCwind platform, which is composed of Wavestar WEC and a floating wind turbine to evaluate the power matrix under different regular wave conditions and different Wavestar diameters. Firstly, the effects of the Wavestar diameter and power take-off (PTO) damping coefficient on the absorbed power of a single Wavestar placed on the fixed point are investigated using the potential flow-based boundary element method (BEM). Secondly, considering the opti-mum PTO damping coefficient, the effect of Wavestar diameter on the total absorbed power was found. Finally, numerical simulation is extended for different wave periods and wave heights to estimate the total power matrix and the capture width ratio (CWR) matrix under different diameters. According to the numerical results, it is indicated that the maximum absorbed power and maximum CWR are obtained around the wave periods (T = 5s and T = 6s) for all wave heights (H = 1~4m) and Wavestar diameters (D = 5-10m). The heave response of the DeepCwind and three Wavestars (WS1 (or WS3) and WS2) in frequency domains are presented and discussed at various conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Evaluation of internal force superposition on a TLP for wind turbines [J].
Adam, Frank ;
Myland, Thomas ;
Schuldt, Burkhard ;
Grossmann, Jochen ;
Dahlhaus, Frank .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 71 :271-275
[2]  
American Petroleum Institute, 1989, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms, V2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ISCOT DEV FIXED FLOA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, DEFINITION SEMISUBME
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Floating Structures: A Guide for Design and Analysis
[6]  
Aubault A, 2011, OMAE2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, VOL 5, P235
[7]   Design considerations for tension leg platform wind turbines [J].
Bachynski, Erin E. ;
Moan, Torgeir .
MARINE STRUCTURES, 2012, 29 (01) :89-114
[8]  
Bachynski Erin E., 2013, P ASME 32 INT C OCEA, V8
[9]   Wave energy extraction and hydroelastic response reduction of modular floating breakwaters as array wave energy converters integrated into a very large floating structure [J].
Cheng, Yong ;
Xi, Chen ;
Dai, Saishuai ;
Ji, Chunyan ;
Collu, Maurizio ;
Li, Mingxin ;
Yuan, Zhiming ;
Incecik, Atilla .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 306
[10]   Power performance and dynamic responses of a combined floating vertical axis wind turbine and wave energy converter concept [J].
Cheng, Zhengshun ;
Wen, Ting Rui ;
Ong, Muk Chen ;
Wang, Kai .
ENERGY, 2019, 171 :190-204