Diagnosing the Locus of Trust: A Temporal Perspective for Trustor, Trustee, and Dyadic Influences on Perceived Trustworthiness

被引:119
作者
Jones, Stephen L. [1 ]
Shah, Priti Pradhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Dept Strateg Management & Entrepreneurship, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Dept Work & Org, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
interpersonal trust; perceived trustworthiness; multilevel analysis; social relations model; ULTIMATE ATTRIBUTION ERROR; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST; NETWORK STRUCTURE; POSITIVE MOOD; PERFORMANCE; CONSENSUS; IMPACT; MODEL; ACQUAINTANCE;
D O I
10.1037/apl0000041
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Extant trust research champions 3 different centers of action that determine perceptions of trust: the trustor (the individual rendering trust judgments), the trustee (the party being trusted), and the trustor-trustee dyad. We refer to the centers of action as loci of trust. Thus far, researchers have investigated determinants residing within each locus independently but have not concurrently investigated all 3 loci. Thus, the relative influence of each locus on perceptions of trust is unknown. Nor is it known how the influence of each locus changes with time. Where is the dominant locus of trust? And how does it change over time? We address these questions by examining the influence of trustors, trustees, and dyads on perceived ability, benevolence, and integrity. We find that trustor influence decreases over time while trustee and dyadic influences increase. We also find that the trustor is the dominant locus for perceived ability, benevolence, and integrity initially, but over time the trustee becomes the dominant locus for perceived ability and integrity. For perceived benevolence, the trustor remains the dominant driver over time.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 414
页数:23
相关论文
共 98 条
[41]  
Janis IL., 1983, GROUPTHINK
[42]  
Jarvenpaa S. L., 1998, Journal of Management Information Systems, V14, P29
[43]  
John O. P., 1991, The Big Five Inventory Versions 4a and 54
[44]   MEASUREMENT OF SPECIFIC INTERPERSONAL-TRUST - CONSTRUCTION AND VALIDATION OF A SCALE TO ASSESS TRUST IN A SPECIFIC OTHER [J].
JOHNSONGEORGE, C ;
SWAP, WC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 43 (06) :1306-1317
[45]   The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork [J].
Jones, GR ;
George, JM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :531-546
[47]   PROCESSES OF CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION [J].
KELLEY, HH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1973, 28 (02) :107-128
[48]   CONSENSUS AT ZERO ACQUAINTANCE - REPLICATION, BEHAVIORAL CUES, AND STABILITY [J].
KENNY, DA ;
HORNER, C ;
KASHY, DA ;
CHU, LC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (01) :88-97
[49]   Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations [J].
Kim, PH ;
Ferrin, DL ;
Cooper, CD ;
Dirks, KT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (01) :104-118
[50]   Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization [J].
Kleinbaum, Adam M. ;
Stuart, Toby E. ;
Tushman, Michael L. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (05) :1316-1336