Efficacy and safety comparison of two amoxicillin administration schedules after third molar removal. A randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial

被引:26
作者
Luaces-Rey, Ramon [1 ]
Arenaz-Bua, Jorge [1 ]
Lopez-Cedrun-Cembranos, Jose-Luis [1 ]
Martinez-Roca, Cristina
Pertega-Diaz, Sonia
Sironvalle-Soliva, Sheyla [1 ]
机构
[1] A Coruna Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, La Coruna, Spain
来源
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL | 2010年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
Antibiotic prophylaxis; third molar surgery; oral surgery; INFLAMMATORY COMPLICATIONS; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; SURGERY; ACID;
D O I
10.4317/medoral.15.e633
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this comparative double-blind, prospective, randomized, clinical trial was to evaluate two amoxicillin administration patterns. The first was a short prophylactic therapy and the second a long postoperative regimen. Study Design: The study population consisted of 160 patients who underwent mandibular third molar extraction. Patients were randomized into two equal groups. In group 1, 2 grams of amoxicillin were administered 1 hour before the procedure and 1 gram 6 hours after surgery. In group 2, patients received 1 gram of amoxicillin 6 hours after surgery followed by 1 gram every 8 hour for 4 days. All patients received the same number of tablets thanks to the use of placebo pills. A total of 25 variables were evaluated, such as alveolitis, surgical infection, number of analgesic needed, subjective pain scale, post-surgical inflammation, consistency of the diet, axillary temperature and millimetres of mouth opening loss after the surgery. Results: No statistically significant post-operative differences were found within the recorded parameters between the groups. Conclusions: Postoperative 4-days amoxicillin therapy is not justified.
引用
收藏
页码:E633 / E638
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条