Arsenic exposure levels of petrochemical workers in three workplace settings in Rayong Province, Thailand

被引:3
作者
Boonkhao, Laksanee [1 ]
Phanprasit, Wantanee [1 ]
Robson, Mark Gregory [2 ]
Sujirarat, Dusit [3 ]
Kwonpongsagoon, Suphaphat [4 ]
Tangtong, Chaiyanun [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Rutgers, Sch Environm & Biol Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Mahidol Univ, Dept Biostat, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Mahidol Univ, Dept Sanit Engn, Bangkok, Thailand
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2017年 / 23卷 / 07期
关键词
arsenic; petrochemical workers; exposure; cooked food; drinking water; urinary arsenic; HUMAN RISK-ASSESSMENT; METABOLISM; SPECIATION; SEAFOOD; FISH; CRUSTACEANS; MOLLUSKS; URINE; METAL;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.2017.1333406
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Background: Crude oil and natural gas are often contaminated with arsenic. As a carcinogen, arsenic contamination in the workplace is of concern, particularly when urinary arsenic levels are higher than the standard. The aim of this study was to identify exposure sources of arsenic among petrochemical workers. Methods: A total of 188 operators and 30 office workers participated in the study. Ninety-three workplace air samples, three main meals in five consecutive days, and drinking water were collected from each participant. Urine was collected at the end of the day after the last food sample was collected from each subject. Urine samples where arsenic concentration exceeded 100 mg/L were further analyzed to identify species. Results: The average arsenic concentrations in operators' and office workers' food and urine were 0.55 +/- 1.00 and 0.49 +/- 0.67 mg/kg; and 76.43 +/- 107.36 and 149.92 +/- 200.28 mg/L, respectively. The arsenic concentrations in air and water were well below their standards. The urinary arsenic correlated well with arsenic in the food but not in the air and water. Conclusion: Occupational exposure to arsenic among operators and office workers was lower than 1% TLV (Threshold limit value) and did not differ significantly. The major source of arsenic exposure Q2 was food.
引用
收藏
页码:1645 / 1654
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ACGIH, 2016, 2016 TLVS AND BEI
[2]  
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), 2007, TOXICOLOGICAL PROFIL, DOI [10.15620/cdc:11481, DOI 10.15620/CDC:11481]
[3]   The heavy metal contents of some selected medicinal plants sampled from different geographical locations [J].
Annan, Kofi ;
Dickson, Rita A. ;
Amponsah, Isaac K. ;
Nooni, Isaac K. .
PHARMACOGNOSY RESEARCH, 2013, 5 (02) :103-108
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, GUIDELINES DRINKING
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, V20th
[6]  
AOAC International, 2012, J AOAC INT, V96, P704
[7]  
ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry), 2000, TOX PROF ARS
[8]   Seafood arsenic: Implications for human risk assessment [J].
Borak, Jonathan ;
Hosgood, H. Dean .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 47 (02) :204-212
[9]   Understanding arsenic metabolism through spectroscopic determination of arsenic in human urine [J].
Brima, Eid I. ;
Jenkins, Richard O. ;
Haris, Parvez I. .
SPECTROSCOPY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2006, 20 (03) :125-151
[10]   Methylated arsenicals: The implications of metabolism and carcinogenicity studies in rodents to human risk assessment [J].
Cohen, SM ;
Arnold, LL ;
Eldan, M ;
Lewis, AS ;
Beck, BD .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 36 (02) :99-133