The optimal concentration of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for labor pain management using patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

被引:16
|
作者
Baliuliene, V. [1 ,2 ]
Macas, A. [1 ,2 ]
Rimaitis, K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Acad Med, Dept Anesthesiol, A Mickeviciaus 9, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Hosp Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Kaunas Clin, Dept Anesthesiol, Eiveniu 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
Pain; Labor; Epidural; Analgesia; Patient-controlled; PLUS SUFENTANIL; ROPIVACAINE; SATISFACTION; AMBULATION; OBSTETRICS; DELIVERY; INFUSION; OUTCOMES; BOLUSES; MODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.05.002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different low concentrations of two local anesthetics for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial recruiting healthy nulliparous women was conducted from 2014 to 2017. Epidural analgesia was provided using local anesthetic and fentanyl. Patients were allocated to six groups, according to the concentration of bupivacaine or levobupivacaine (0.0625%, 0.1%, 0.125%). Analgesic efficacy, vital parameters, and side effects were evaluated at different time points. Satisfaction was evaluated using verbal and written scores. The primary outcome was the total dose of local anesthetic used. Results: Two-hundred-and-thirty-seven cases were analyzed. The total dose of local anesthetic was significantly lower in the two lower concentration groups (P<0.0001). The rate of cesarean section was lower in 0.1% bupivacaine versus 0.1% levobupivacaine (P=0.005), 0.125% levobupivacaine (P=0.049) and 0.125% bupivacaine (P=0.002) groups. Pain breakthrough, patient-controlled and rescue boluses were significantly different between groups (P=0.03, P=0.003 and P<0.0001 respectively). The rate of motor block increased with higher concentrations (P=0.033), but the incidence of other maternal and fetal side effects was not significantly different. Satisfaction with labor analgesia did not differ across groups. Satisfaction score 72 hours after delivery was significantly lower than that two hours after delivery (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Higher local anesthetic concentration resulted in higher total doses infused and greater motor block. Labor analgesia was less effective when the lowest concentrations were used, but patient satisfaction was unaffected. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor pain management using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA): A double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Bihani, Pooja
    Vyas, Medha
    Soni, Shikha
    Jaju, Rishabh
    Janweja, Sarita
    Choudhary, Usha
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 40 (03) : 463 - 469
  • [2] Comparison of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized clinical trial
    Wang Li-zhong
    Chang Xiang-yang
    Liu Xia
    Hu Xiao-xia
    Tang Bei-lei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (02) : 178 - 183
  • [3] Labor analgesia: Comparison of epidural patient-controlled analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
    Sugur, Tayfun
    Kizilates, Esra
    Kizilates, Ali
    Inanoglu, Kerem
    Karsli, Bilge
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01): : 8 - 18
  • [4] A double-blind randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with or without a background infusion following initial spinal analgesia for labor pain
    Okutomi, T.
    Saito, M.
    Mochizuki, J.
    Amano, K.
    Hoka, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2009, 18 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [5] A randomized controlled trial using patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.25% versus 0.0625% bupivacaine in nulliparous labor: effect on analgesia requirement and maternal satisfaction
    Ginosar, Y.
    Davidson, E. M.
    Firman, N.
    Meroz, Y.
    Lemmens, H.
    Weiniger, C. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 19 (02) : 171 - 178
  • [6] Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
    Halpern, Stephen H.
    Carvalho, Brendan
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (03) : 921 - 928
  • [7] Thoracic epidural analgesia or patient-controlled local analgesia for radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blind study
    Fant, F.
    Axelsson, K.
    Sandblom, D.
    Magnuson, A.
    Andersson, S. -O.
    Gupta, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (05) : 782 - 789
  • [8] A randomized control trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with and without a background infusion using levobupivacaine and fentanyl
    Brogly, N.
    Schiraldi, R.
    Vazquez, B.
    Perez, J.
    Guasch, E.
    Gilsanz, F.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2011, 77 (12) : 1149 - 1154
  • [9] Can Epidural Dexamethasone Reduce Patient-Controlled Epidural Consumption of Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine in Laboring Women? A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Dhal, Ankur
    Mitra, Sukanya
    Saroa, Richa
    Singh, Jasveer
    Mehra, Reeti
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2019, 69 (03) : 258 - 265
  • [10] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor: The addition of clonidine to bupivacaine-fentanyl
    Paech, MJ
    Pavy, TJG
    Orlikowski, CEP
    Evans, SF
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (01) : 34 - 40