Deep Learning and Phenology Enhance Large-Scale Tree Species Classification in Aerial Imagery during a Biosecurity Response

被引:14
作者
Pearse, Grant D. [1 ]
Watt, Michael S. [2 ]
Soewarto, Julia [1 ]
Tan, Alan Y. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Scion, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand
[2] Scion, 10 Kyle St, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
关键词
tree species; classification; deep learning; convolutional networks; biosecurity; forest pathology; myrtle rust; urban forestry; machine learning; aerial imagery; PUCCINIA-PSIDII; MYRTLE RUST; TROPICAL FORESTS; MANAGEMENT; LEAF; INDEXES;
D O I
10.3390/rs13091789
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ability of deep convolutional neural networks (deep learning) to learn complex visual characteristics offers a new method to classify tree species using lower-cost data such as regional aerial RGB imagery. In this study, we use 10 cm resolution imagery and 4600 trees to develop a deep learning model to identify Metrosideros excelsa (pohutukawa)-a culturally important New Zealand tree that displays distinctive red flowers during summer and is under threat from the invasive pathogen Austropuccinia psidii (myrtle rust). Our objectives were to compare the accuracy of deep learning models that could learn the distinctive visual characteristics of the canopies with tree-based models (XGBoost) that used spectral and textural metrics. We tested whether the phenology of pohutukawa could be used to enhance classification by using multitemporal aerial imagery that showed the same trees with and without widespread flowering. The XGBoost model achieved an accuracy of 86.7% on the dataset with strong phenology (flowering). Without phenology, the accuracy fell to 79.4% and the model relied on the blueish hue and texture of the canopies. The deep learning model achieved 97.4% accuracy with 96.5% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity when leveraging phenology-even though the intensity of flowering varied substantially. Without strong phenology, the accuracy of the deep learning model remained high at 92.7% with sensitivity of 91.2% and specificity of 94.3% despite significant variation in the appearance of non-flowering pohutukawa. Pooling time-series imagery did not enhance either approach. The accuracy of XGBoost and deep learning models were, respectively, 83.2% and 95.2%, which were of intermediate precision between the separate models.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GENETIC BASIS PATHOG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Flora ofNewZealand
[3]   A Spectral Mapping Signature for the Rapid Ohia Death (ROD) Pathogen in Hawaiian Forests [J].
Asner, Gregory P. ;
Martin, Roberta E. ;
Keith, Lisa M. ;
Heller, Wade P. ;
Hughes, Marc A. ;
Vaughn, Nicholas R. ;
Hughes, R. Flint ;
Balzotti, Christopher .
REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (03)
[4]   Tree Species Classification Using Hyperspectral Imagery: A Comparison of Two Classifiers [J].
Ballanti, Laurel ;
Blesius, Leonhard ;
Hines, Ellen ;
Kruse, Bill .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (06)
[5]  
Bannari A., 1995, Remote Sens. Rev, V13, P95, DOI [10.1080/02757259509532298, DOI 10.1080/02757259509532298]
[6]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[7]  
Beresford Robert M., 2018, New Zealand Plant Protection, V71, P332, DOI [10.30843/nzpp.2018.71.176, 10.30843/nzpp.2018.71]
[8]   Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges [J].
Bioucas-Dias, Jose M. ;
Plaza, Antonio ;
Camps-Valls, Gustavo ;
Scheunders, Paul ;
Nasrabadi, Nasser M. ;
Chanussot, Jocelyn .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING MAGAZINE, 2013, 1 (02) :6-36
[9]   Can we really manage tropical forests without knowing the species within? Getting back to the basics of forest management through taxonomy [J].
Biscaia de Lacerda, Andre Eduardo ;
Nimmo, Evelyn Roberta .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 259 (05) :995-1002
[10]   Object based image analysis for remote sensing [J].
Blaschke, T. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 65 (01) :2-16