The contribution of recollection and familiarity to yes-no and forced-choice recognition tests in healthy subjects and amnesics

被引:62
作者
Khoe, W
Kroll, NEA [1 ]
Yonelinas, AP
Dobbins, IG
Knight, RT
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
dual process; signal detection; memory assessment; remember-know;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00055-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent reports suggest that some amnesic patients perform relatively normally on forced-choice recognition memory tests. Their preserved performance may reflect the fact that the test relies more heavily on assessments of familiarity, a process that is relatively preserved in these patients, than do other recognition tests such as yes-no tests, which may rely more on recollection. The current study examined recognition memory using yes-no and forced-choice procedures in control and amnesic patients in order to determine whether the two tasks differentially relied on recollection and familiarity, and whether the extent of the recognition memory deficit observed in amnesia was dependent upon the type of recognition test used to measure performance. Results using the remember-know procedure with healthy subjects showed that there were no substantial differences in recognition accuracy or in the contribution of recollection to these two tasks. Moreover, amnesic patients were not found to perform better on a forced-choice test than on a yes-no test, suggesting that familiarity contributed equally to these two types of recognition test. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1333 / 1341
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Amnesia and recognition memory: A re-analysis of psychometric data
    Aggleton, JP
    Shaw, C
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (01) : 51 - 62
  • [2] Atkinson R.C., 1974, Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: I. Learning, P243
  • [3] Cave C B, 1991, Hippocampus, V1, P329, DOI 10.1002/hipo.450010323
  • [4] LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH
    CRAIK, FIM
    LOCKHART, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06): : 671 - 684
  • [5] Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory
    Duzel, E
    Yonelinas, AP
    Mangun, GR
    Heinze, HJ
    Tulving, E
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (11) : 5973 - 5978
  • [6] FUNCTIONAL-ASPECTS OF RECOLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE
    GARDINER, JM
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1988, 16 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [7] How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory
    Gardiner, JM
    Java, RI
    RichardsonKlavehn, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1996, 50 (01): : 114 - 122
  • [8] Henson RNA, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P3962
  • [9] RECOGNITION AND RECALL IN AMNESIACS
    HIRST, W
    JOHNSON, MK
    KIM, JK
    RISSE, G
    PHELPS, EA
    VOLPE, BT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1986, 12 (03) : 445 - 451
  • [10] MORE ON RECOGNITION AND RECALL IN AMNESIACS
    HIRST, W
    PHELPS, EA
    JOHNSON, MK
    VOLPE, BT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1988, 14 (04) : 758 - 762