Oncologic Outcomes of Complex Segmentectomy: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background. Complex segmentectomy creates several intricate intersegmental planes; however, it has not been fully established in lung cancer treatment. We compared the oncologic outcomes of complex segmentectomy and lobectomy through a large cohort, multicenter database using propensity score-matched analysis. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed data from 1517 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer with a solid component size 2.0 cm or less, who underwent surgical resection at 3 institutions between 2010 and 2018. Complex segmentectomy (n = 240) and location-adjusted lobectomy (n = 851) as well as surgical results were analyzed for all patients and their propensity scorematched pairs. Results. The prognosis of patients undergoing complex segmentectomy was not significantly different from that of patients undergoing lobectomy (5-year cancer-specific survival [CSS] rate, 96.4% versus 97.2%, P = .69; and 5-year recurrence-free interval [RFI] rate, 95.8% versus 93.4%, P = .19). This trend was also identified in subanalyses for pure solid tumors. However, there were major differences in clinicopathologic features between the 2 groups. After propensity score-matched analysis, proper matching of patients was ascertained. In 219 propensity score-matched pairs, long-term outcomes were similar between patients undergoing complex segmentectomy (5-year CSS, 96.0%; 5-year RFI, 95.5%) and lobectomy (5-year CSS, 97.8%; 5-year RFI, 95.9%). Propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis for RFI revealed that prognosis associated with complex segmentectomy was comparable to the prognosis obtained with lobectomy (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-2.40; P = .98). Conclusions. Complex segmentectomy provides acceptable oncologic outcomes in clinical stage I lung cancer treatment. (C) 2021 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons