Self-regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review

被引:160
作者
van Houten-Schat, Maaike A. [1 ,2 ]
Berkhout, Joris J. [3 ]
van Dijk, Nynke [4 ]
Endedijk, Maaike D. [5 ]
Jaarsma, A. Debbie C. [2 ]
Diemers, Agnes D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Res & Innovat Med Educ, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Ctr Evidence Based Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci, Dept Educ Sci, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
MEDICAL-EDUCATION; STUDENTS; BELIEFS; PLANS;
D O I
10.1111/medu.13615
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesResearch has suggested beneficial effects of self-regulated learning (SRL) for medical students' and residents' workplace-based learning. Ideally, learners go through a cyclic process of setting learning goals, choosing learning strategies and assessing progress towards goals. A clear overview of medical students' and residents' successful key strategies, influential factors and effective interventions to stimulate SRL in the workplace is missing. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of and a theoretical base for effective SRL strategies of medical students and residents for their learning in the clinical context. MethodsThis systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Association for Medical Education in Europe. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC and the Cochrane Library from January 1992 to July 2016. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included. Two reviewers independently performed the review process and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. A total of 3341 publications were initially identified and 18 were included in the review. ResultsWe found diversity in the use of SRL strategies by medical students and residents, which is linked to individual (goal setting), contextual (time pressure, patient care and supervision) and social (supervisors and peers) factors. Three types of intervention were identified (coaching, learning plans and supportive tools). However, all interventions focused on goal setting and monitoring and none on supporting self-evaluation. ConclusionsSelf-regulated learning in the clinical environment is a complex process that results from an interaction between person and context. Future research should focus on unravelling the process of SRL in the clinical context and specifically on how medical students and residents assess their progress towards goals. This study outlines the complexity of self-regulated learning as a process with individual differences between students that is influenced by multiple factors at individual, social and contextual levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1015
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Mentor-Guided Self-Directed Learning Affects Resident Practice [J].
Aho, Johnathon M. ;
Ruparel, Raaj K. ;
Graham, Elaina ;
Zendejas-Mummert, Benjamin ;
Heller, Stephanie F. ;
Farley, David R. ;
Bingener, Juliane .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 72 (04) :674-679
[2]   Using tablets to support self-regulated learning in a longitudinal integrated clerkship [J].
Alegria, Dylan Archbold Hufty ;
Boscardin, Christy ;
Poncelet, Ann ;
Mayfield, Chandler ;
Wamsley, Maria .
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2014, 19
[3]   Achievement Goal Structures and Self-Regulated Learning: Relationships and Changes in Medical School [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
Dong, Ting ;
DeZee, Kent J. ;
Gilliland, William R. ;
Waechter, Donna M. ;
Cruess, David ;
Durning, Steven J. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2012, 87 (10) :1375-1381
[4]   How clinical medical students perceive others to influence their self-regulated learning [J].
Berkhout, Joris J. ;
Helmich, Esther ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. ;
Jaarsma, A. Debbie C. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 51 (03) :269-279
[5]   Patterns in clinical students' self-regulated learning behavior: a Q-methodology study [J].
Berkhout, Joris J. ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Helmich, Esther ;
van Exel, Job ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. ;
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 22 (01) :105-121
[6]   Exploring the factors influencing clinical students' self-regulated learning [J].
Berkhout, Joris J. ;
Helmich, Esther ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
van den Berg, Joost W. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. ;
Jaarsma, A. Debbie C. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (06) :589-600
[7]   Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions [J].
Bjork, Robert A. ;
Dunlosky, John ;
Kornell, Nate .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :417-+
[8]   Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students [J].
Boekaerts, M .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 1997, 7 (02) :161-186
[9]   A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice [J].
Brydges, Ryan ;
Butler, Deborah .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (01) :71-79
[10]  
Dornan T., 2011, Medical education theory and practice