Bioequivalence assessment of two capsule formulations of omeprazole in healthy volunteers

被引:1
作者
Hussein, Rajaa F. [1 ]
Lockyer, Marilyn [1 ]
Hammami, Muhammad M. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Clin Res Ctr, Riyadh 1211, Saudi Arabia
来源
ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH | 2007年 / 57卷 / 02期
关键词
CAS; 73590-58-6; Emilok (TM); omeprazole; bioavailability; bioequivalence; pharmacokinetics; proton pump inhibitor; S-MEPHENYTOIN; PHARMACOKINETICS; SINGLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; METABOLISM; HUMANS; HYDROXYLATION; DISPOSITION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
A randomized, single-dose, crossover study was conducted to assess the bioavailabitity of two omeprazole (CAS 73590-58-6) capsule formulations, Emilok (TM) (test) and a commercially available original preparation (reference), under fasting conditions. A 20 mg dose of each formulation was administered to 36 healthy male volunteers with one-week washout period, 17 blood samples were collected over 12 h, plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by a locally validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay, and omeprazole pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by the standard non-compartmental method. Mean +/- SD of C-max, T-max, AUC(0 -> t), AUC(0 ->infinity), and t(1/2) were 0.41 +/- 0.21 and 0.48 +/- 0.27 mu g/ml, 1.98 +/- 1.02 and 1.63 +/- 0.78 h, 0.95 +/- 0.78 and 1.00 +/- 0.90 mu g . h/ml, 0.99 +/- 0.81 and 1.04 +/- 0.95 mu g . h/ml, and 1.30 +/- 0.64 and 1.14 +/- 0.61 h for the test and reference formulations, respectively. The parametric 90% confidence intervals on mean difference between log-transformed values of the two formulations were within the acceptable bioequivalence range of 80% to 125% for AUC(0 -> t) and AUC(0 ->infinity) (88.63% to 104.98%, and 91.71% to 106.86%, respectively) but not for C-max (76.27% to 103.63%). ANOVA revealed significant subject's effect for AUC(0 -> t),, AUC(0 ->infinity), C-max, and t(1/2) with a ratio of the inter-subject to intra-subject coefficient of variation of 3.66, 3.92, 1.25, and 1.46, respectively. The results confirm the presence of marked individual variations in the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and indicate that the two formulations are equivalent in relation to the extent but not the rate of absorption.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 105
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOAVAILABILITY OF OMEPRAZOLE AFTER SINGLE AND REPEATED ORAL-ADMINISTRATION IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS
    ANDERSSON, T
    ANDREN, K
    CEDERBERG, C
    LAGERSTROM, PO
    LUNDBORG, P
    SKANBERG, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 29 (05) : 557 - 563
  • [2] POLYMORPHIC HYDROXYLATION OF S-MEPHENYTOIN AND OMEPRAZOLE METABOLISM IN CAUCASIAN AND CHINESE SUBJECTS
    ANDERSSON, T
    REGARDH, CG
    LOU, YC
    ZHANG, Y
    DAHL, ML
    BERTILSSON, L
    [J]. PHARMACOGENETICS, 1992, 2 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [3] Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole
    Andersson, T
    Röhss, K
    Bredberg, E
    Hassan-Alin, M
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 15 (10) : 1563 - 1569
  • [4] SLOW OMEPRAZOLE METABOLIZERS ARE ALSO POOR S-MEPHENYTOIN HYDROXYLATORS
    ANDERSSON, T
    REGARDH, CG
    DAHLPUUSTINEN, ML
    BERTILSSON, L
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1990, 12 (04) : 415 - 416
  • [5] INTERPHENOTYPE DIFFERENCES IN DISPOSITION AND EFFECT ON GASTRIN-LEVELS OF OMEPRAZOLE - SUITABILITY OF OMEPRAZOLE AS A PROBE FOR CYP2C19
    CHANG, M
    TYBRING, G
    DAHL, ML
    GOTHARSON, E
    SAGAR, M
    SEENSALU, R
    BERTILSSON, L
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 39 (05) : 511 - 518
  • [6] Dallal GE., LITTLE HDB STAT PRAC
  • [7] Multiple-dose studies can be a more sensitive assessment for bioequivalence than single-dose studies - The case with omeprazole
    Elkoshi, Z
    Behr, D
    Mirimsky, A
    Tsvetkov, I
    Danon, A
    [J]. CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2002, 22 (09) : 585 - 592
  • [8] Bioequivalence evaluation of two omeprazole enteric-coated formulations in humans
    Farinha, A
    Bica, A
    Pais, JP
    Toscano, MC
    Tavares, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 7 (04) : 311 - 315
  • [9] CΥP2C19 genotype status and effect of omeprazole on intragastric pH in humans
    Furuta, T
    Ohashi, K
    Kosuge, K
    Zhao, XJ
    Takashima, M
    Kimura, M
    Nishimoto, M
    Hanai, H
    Kaneko, E
    Ishizaki, T
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 65 (05) : 552 - 561
  • [10] HAUSCHKE D, 1992, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V30, pS37