Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review

被引:130
作者
Luijsterburg, Pim A. J.
Verhagen, Arianne P.
Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
van Os, Ton A. G.
Peul, Wilco C.
Koes, Bart W.
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Gen Practice, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med EMGO, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Sch Allied Hlth Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leids Univ Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Med Ctr Haaglanden, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
conservative treatment; lumbosacral radicular syndrome; randomised clinical trial; sciatica; systematic review;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-007-0367-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients with a lumbosacral radicular syndrome are mostly treated conservatively first. The effect of the conservative treatments remains controversial. To assess the effectiveness of conservative treatments of the lumbosacral radicular syndrome (sciatica). Relevant electronic databases and the reference lists of articles up to May 2004 were searched. Randomised clinical trials of all types of conservative treatments for patients with the lumbosacral radicular syndrome selected by two reviewers. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality and the clinical relevance. Because the trials were considered heterogeneous we decided not to perform a meta-analysis but to summarise the results using the rating system of levels of evidence. Thirty trials were included that evaluated injections, traction, physical therapy, bed rest, manipulation, medication, and acupuncture as treatment for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome. Because several trials indicated no evidence of an effect it is not recommended to use corticosteroid injections and traction as treatment option. Whether clinicians should prescribe physical therapy, bed rest, manipulation or medication could not be concluded from this review. At present there is no evidence that one type of treatment is clearly superior to others, including no treatment, for patients with a lumbosacral radicular syndrome.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 899
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, COCHRANE LIB
  • [2] TIZANIDINE AND IBUPROFEN IN ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTER STUDY IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
    BERRY, H
    HUTCHINSON, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1988, 16 (02) : 83 - 91
  • [4] Buchner M, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P149
  • [5] Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
    Burton, AK
    Tillotson, KM
    Cleary, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (03) : 202 - 207
  • [6] A CONTROLLED-STUDY OF CAUDAL EPIDURAL INJECTIONS OF TRIAMCINOLONE PLUS PROCAINE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF INTRACTABLE SCIATICA
    BUSH, K
    HILLIER, S
    [J]. SPINE, 1991, 16 (05) : 572 - 575
  • [7] Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus
    Carette, S
    Leclaire, R
    Marcoux, S
    Morin, F
    Blaise, GA
    StPierre, A
    Truchon, R
    Parent, F
    Levesque, J
    Bergeron, V
    Montminy, P
    Blanchette, C
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (23) : 1634 - 1640
  • [8] COXHEAD CE, 1981, LANCET, V1, P1065
  • [9] THE USE OF EPIDURAL STEROIDS IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR RADICULAR PAIN - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY
    CUCKLER, JM
    BERNINI, PA
    WIESEL, SW
    BOOTH, RE
    ROTHMAN, RH
    PICKENS, GT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (01) : 63 - 66
  • [10] Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL register of controlled clinical trials
    Dickersin, K
    Manheimer, E
    Wieland, S
    Robinson, KA
    Lefebvre, C
    McDonald, SD
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (01) : 38 - 64