The effectiveness of EEG-feedback on attention, impulsivity and EEG: A sham feedback controlled study

被引:70
作者
Logemann, H. N. Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Lansbergen, Marieke M. [3 ]
Van Os, Titus W. D. P. [4 ,5 ]
Bocker, Koen B. E. [2 ]
Kenemans, J. Leon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Expt Psychol, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Psychopharmacol, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Psychiat, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] GGZ Friesland, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Neurofeedback; EEG; Double-blind; Sham; Impulsivity; Attention; ADHD; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; INHIBITORY CONTROL; NEUROFEEDBACK; CHILDREN; BIOFEEDBACK; POTENTIALS; COMPONENTS; ADHD;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.026
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
EEG-feedback, also called neurofeedback, is a training procedure aimed at altering brain activity, and is used as a treatment for disorders like Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Studies have reported positive effects of neurofeedback on attention and other dependent variables. However, double-blind studies including a sham neurofeedback control group are lacking. The inclusion of such group is crucial to control for unspecific effects. The current work presents a sham-controlled, double-blind evaluation. The hypothesis was that neurofeedback enhances attention and decreases impulsive behavior. Participants (n = 27) were students selected on relatively high scores on impulsivity/inattention questionnaires (Barrat Impulsivity Scale and Broadbent CFQ). They were assigned to a neurofeedback treatment or a sham group. (sham)Neurofeedback training was planned for 15 weeks consisting of a total of 30 sessions, each lasting 22 min. Before and after 16 sessions (i.e., interim analyses), qEEG was recorded and impulsivity and inattention was assessed using a stop signal task and reversed continuous performance task and two questionnaires. Results of the interim analyses showed that participants were blind with respect to group inclusion, but no trend towards an effect of neurofeedback on behavioral measures was observed. Therefore in line with ethical guidelines the experiment was ceased. These results implicate a possible lack of effect of neurofeedback when one accounts for non-specific effects. However, the specific form of feedback and application of the sham-controlled double-blind design may have diminished the effect of neurofeedback. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: the Effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: a Meta-Analysis [J].
Arns, Martijn ;
de Ridder, Sabine ;
Strehl, Ute ;
Breteler, Marinus ;
Coenen, Anton .
CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 40 (03) :180-189
[2]  
ASCHENBACK TM, 2003, MANUAL ASEBA ADULT F
[3]   Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Logan, GD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2003, 112 (02) :105-142
[5]   THE COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE (CFQ) AND ITS CORRELATES [J].
BROADBENT, DE ;
COOPER, PF ;
FITZGERALD, P ;
PARKES, KR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 21 (FEB) :1-16
[6]   Quantitative electroencephalographic profiles of children with attention deficit disorder [J].
Chabot, RJ ;
Serfontein, G .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 40 (10) :951-963
[7]   EEG-defined subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Clarke, AR ;
Barry, RJ ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (11) :2098-2105
[8]   EEG analysis in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a comparative study of two subtypes [J].
Clarke, AR ;
Barry, RJ ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1998, 81 (01) :19-29
[9]   STRATEGIES AND MECHANISMS IN NONSELECTIVE AND SELECTIVE INHIBITORY MOTOR CONTROL [J].
DEJONG, R ;
COLES, MGH ;
LOGAN, GD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (03) :498-511
[10]   IN SEARCH OF THE POINT OF NO RETURN - THE CONTROL OF RESPONSE PROCESSES [J].
DEJONG, R ;
COLES, MGH ;
LOGAN, GD ;
GRATTON, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) :164-182