共 29 条
Analysis of Wearable and Smartphone-Based Technologies for the Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Different Resistance Training Exercises
被引:87
作者:
Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos
[1
,2
]
Marchante, David
[2
]
Baz-Valle, Eneko
[2
]
Alonso-Molero, Ivan
[2
]
Jimenez, Sergio L.
[1
]
Munoz-Lopez, Mario
[2
]
机构:
[1] European Univ Madrid, Sch Sports Sci, Madrid, Spain
[2] PowerExplos Ctr, Dept Res & Dev, Madrid, Spain
关键词:
monitoring;
biomechanics;
technology;
strength;
validation;
MOVEMENT VELOCITY;
PREDICTION;
STRENGTH;
POWER;
LOAD;
RELIABILITY;
PERFORMANCE;
ADAPTATIONS;
INTENSITY;
VALIDITY;
D O I:
10.3389/fphys.2017.00649
中图分类号:
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号:
071003 ;
摘要:
The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity, reliability, and accuracy of new wearable and smartphone-based technology for the measurement of barbell velocity in resistance training exercises. To do this, 10 highly trained powerlifters (age = 26.1 +/- 3.9 years) performed 11 repetitions with loads ranging 50-100% of the 1-Repetition maximum in the bench-press, full-squat, and hip-thrust exercises while barbell velocity was simultaneously measured using a linear transducer (LT), two Beast wearable devices (one placed on the subjects' wrist -BW-, and the other one directly attached to the barbell -BB-) and the iOS PowerLift app. Results showed a high correlation between the LT and BW (r = 0.94-0.98, SEE = 0.04-0.07 m.s(-1)), BB (r = 0.97-0.98, SEE = 0.04-0.05 m.s(-1)), and the PowerLift app (r = 0.97-0.98, SEE = 0.03-0.05 m.s(-1)) for the measurement of barbell velocity in the three exercises. Paired samples T-test revealed systematic biases between the LT and BW, BB and the app in the hip-thrust, between the LT and BW in the full-squat and between the LT and BB in the bench-press exercise (p < 0.001). Moreover, the analysis of the linear regression on the Bland-Altman plots showed that the differences between the LT and BW (R-2 = 0.004-0.03), BB (R-2 = 0.007-0.01), and the app (R-2 = 0.001-0.03) were similar across the whole range of velocities analyzed. Finally, the reliability of the BW (ICC = 0.910-0.988), BB (ICC = 0.922-0.990), and the app (ICC = 0.928-0.989) for the measurement of the two repetitions performed with each load were almost the same than that observed with the LT (ICC = 0.937-0.990). Both the Beast wearable device and the PowerLift app were highly valid, reliable, and accurate for the measurement of barbell velocity in the bench-press, full-squat, and hip-thrust exercises. These results could have potential practical applications for strength and conditioning coaches who wish to measure barbell velocity during resistance training.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文