Preemption of space can lead to intransitive coexistence of competitors

被引:28
作者
Edwards, Kyle F. [1 ,2 ]
Schreiber, Sebastian J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Populat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
ROCK-PAPER-SCISSORS; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; TRADE-OFF; COMMUNITY; BIODIVERSITY; COLONIZATION; ENVIRONMENTS; MECHANISMS; STRATEGIES; DISPERSAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18068.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Intransitive competition has the potential to be a powerful contributor to species coexistence, but there are few proposed biological mechanisms that could create intransitivities in natural communities. Using a three-species model of competition for space, we demonstrate a mechanism for coexistence that combines a colonization-competition tradeoff between two species with the ability of a third species to preempt space from the other competitors. The combination of differential abilities to colonize, preempt, and overtake space creates a community where no single species can exclude both of its competitors. The dynamics of this kind of community are analogous to rock-paper-scissors competition, and the three-species community can persist even though not all pairs of species can coexist in isolation. In distinction to prior results, this is a mechanism of intransitivity that does not require nonhierarchical local interference competition. We present parameter estimates from a subtidal marine community illustrating how documented competitive traits can lead to preemption-based intransitivities in natural communities, and we describe methods for an empirical test of the occurrence of this mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1209
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Maintaining diversity in an ant community: Modeling, extending, and testing the dominance-discovery trade-off [J].
Adler, F. R. ;
LeBrun, E. G. ;
Feener, D. H., Jr. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 169 (03) :323-333
[2]  
Adler FR, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P3226, DOI 10.2307/177412
[3]  
Agrawal AA, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P145, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[145:FKGIPA]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis [J].
Amarasekare, P .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2003, 6 (12) :1109-1122
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, EVOLUTIONARY GAMES P
[7]   Spatial moment equations for plant competition: Understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal [J].
Bolker, BM ;
Pacala, SW .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 153 (06) :575-602
[8]   COMPETITIVE INTRANSITIVITY AND SIZE-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF INTERACTING POPULATIONS [J].
BUSS, LW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1980, 77 (09) :5355-5359
[9]   COMPETITIVE NETWORKS - NON-TRANSITIVE COMPETITIVE RELATIONSHIPS IN CRYPTIC CORAL-REEF ENVIRONMENTS [J].
BUSS, LW ;
JACKSON, JBC .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1979, 113 (02) :223-234
[10]   Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization trade-off is not dead [J].
Calcagno, V. ;
Mouquet, N. ;
Jarne, P. ;
David, P. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (08) :897-907