Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: Optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy

被引:36
作者
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Jin, Wanqing [1 ]
Wang, Qinmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Coll, Sch Optometry & Ophthalmol, Hosp Eye, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS; SEGMENT; IOLMASTER; IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.038
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability, interexaminer reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements obtained by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes. SETTING: Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. METHODS: In this prospective study, the central ACD in right pseudophakic eyes and right phakic eyes was measured with the Visante AS-OCT system and the OTI-Scan HF 35-50 UBM system. Intraexaminer repeatability and interexaminer reproducibility were evaluated in a subgroup of eyes from each group. The repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean ACD in the 70 pseudophakic eyes was 3.91 mm +/- 0.29 (SD) by AS-OCT and 3.76 +/- 0.33 mm by UBM and in the 70 phakic eyes, 2.97 +/- 0.31 mm and 2.90 +/- 0.32 mm, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement between the 2 methods were 0.32 to 0.62 mm in pseudophakic eyes and -0.11 to 0.25 mm in phakic eyes. The ICC for the repeatability and reproducibility of AS-OCT and UBM measurements was high (range 0.985 to 0.996). CONCLUSIONS: Both AS-OCT and UBM ACD measurements showed good repeatability and reproducibility. However, the agreement was better in phakic eyes than in pseudophakic eyes. Thus, the measurements should not be used interchangeably in pseudophakic eyes.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 946
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Measurement of the internal diameter and depth of the anterior chamber: IOLMaster versus anterior chamber optical coherence tomographer [J].
Baikoff, G ;
Jodai, HJ ;
Bourgeon, G .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (09) :1722-1728
[2]   METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY [J].
BARTKO, JJ ;
CARPENTER, WT .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1976, 163 (05) :307-317
[3]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth [J].
Buehl, W ;
Stojanac, D ;
Sacu, S ;
Drexler, W ;
Findl, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (01) :7-12
[6]   Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessment of the anterior segment [J].
Dada, Tanuj ;
Sihota, Ramanjit ;
Gadia, Ritu ;
Aggarwal, Anand ;
Mandal, Subrata ;
Gupta, Viney .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 33 (05) :837-840
[7]  
Devereux JG, 2000, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V118, P257
[8]   Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements [J].
Elbaz, Uri ;
Barkana, Yaniv ;
Gerber, Yariv ;
Avni, Isaac ;
Zadok, David .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 143 (01) :48-53
[9]   Magnetic resonance imaging and Orbscan assessment of the anterior chamber [J].
Fea, AM ;
Annetta, F ;
Cirillo, S ;
Campanella, D ;
De Giuseppe, M ;
Regge, D ;
Grignolo, FM .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (09) :1713-1718
[10]   A 3-PART SYSTEM FOR REFINING INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
PRAGER, TC ;
CHANDLER, TY ;
MUSGROVE, KH ;
LEWIS, JW ;
RUIZ, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 14 (01) :17-24