Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on Year 10 biology students' understandings of cell and molecular biology concepts

被引:24
作者
Hand, Brian
Hohenshell, Liesl
Prain, Vaughan
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Western Washington Univ, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
[3] La Trobe Univ, Bendigo, Vic 3550, Australia
关键词
biology; conceptual change; mixed-method; science; writing;
D O I
10.1007/s11251-006-9012-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper reports on a study that examined the cumulative effects on students' learning of science, and perceptions of the role of writing in learning, when the students engaged in multiple writing tasks with planning strategy support. The study was conducted with Year 10 biology students who completed two consecutive units on Cells and Molecular Biology. A mixed method study was implemented using a pre-/post-test design with a focus on student performance on higher order conceptual questions, and semi-structured interviews with treatment students after the completion of each unit of study. Results from the quantitative component indicated that multiple, non-conventional writing had a significant benefit in helping students learn Molecular Biology. The results for the Cell unit were not so conclusive suggesting the strategies are most useful for novel content. The interviews with students demonstrated that they understood and engaged successfully with both the conceptual and linguistic demands of the tasks. These findings, taken as a whole, confirm that multiple writing tasks can support effective student learning, provided various pedagogical conditions are met.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 373
页数:31
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Writing as a Learning tool: Integrating Theory and Practice
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RES LANGUAGE SCH COM
[3]  
Donald M., 1991, Origins of the Modern Mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition
[4]  
Emig J., 1977, COLL COMPOS COMMUN, V28, P122, DOI [10.2307/356095, DOI 10.2307/356095]
[5]   What makes a good writer? Differences in good and poor writers' self-regulation of writing [J].
Ferrari, M ;
Bouffard, T ;
Rainville, L .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1998, 26 (06) :473-488
[6]  
Flower L., 1980, College Composition and Communication, V31, P21, DOI DOI 10.2307/356630
[7]  
Flower L., 1984, WRIT COMMUN, V1, P120, DOI DOI 10.1177/0741088384001001006
[8]   Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing [J].
Galbraith, D ;
Rijlaarsdam, G .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 1999, 9 (02) :93-108
[9]  
Galbraith D., 1999, KNOWING WHAT WRITE C, P139
[10]  
Glaser B., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO