Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling

被引:59
作者
Huang, Po-Hsien [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
structural equation modeling; Akaike information criterion; Bayesian information criterion; root-mean-square error of approximation; model selection; COVARIANCE-STRUCTURES; INFORMATION CRITERIA; UNIFIED APPROACH; HYPOTHESES; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1007/s11336-017-9572-y
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Model selection is a popular strategy in structural equation modeling (SEM). To select an "optimal" model, many selection criteria have been proposed. In this study, we derive the asymptotics of several popular selection procedures in SEM, including AIC, BIC, the RMSEA, and a two-stage rule for the RMSEA (RMSEA-2S). All of the results are derived under weak distributional assumptions and can be applied to a wide class of discrepancy functions. The results show that both AIC and BIC asymptotically select a model with the smallest population minimum discrepancy function (MDF) value regardless of nested or non-nested selection, but only BIC could consistently choose the most parsimonious one under nested model selection. When there are many non-nested models attaining the smallest MDF value, the consistency of BIC for the most parsimonious one fails. On the other hand, the RMSEA asymptotically selects a model that attains the smallest population RMSEA value, and the RESEA-2S chooses the most parsimonious model from all models with the population RMSEA smaller than the pre-specified cutoff. The empirical behavior of the considered criteria is also illustrated via four numerical examples.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 426
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, PAPER PRESENTED M PS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
[4]  
Bollen K. A., 1993, Testing structural equation models, V154, DOI DOI 10.1093/SF/73.3.1161
[5]   BIC and Alternative Bayesian Information Criteria in the Selection of Structural Equation Models [J].
Bollen, Kenneth A. ;
Harden, Jeffrey J. ;
Ray, Surajit ;
Zavisca, Jane .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (01) :1-19
[8]  
BROWNE MW, 1974, S AFR STAT J, V8, P1
[9]  
Browne MW., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[10]   MODEL SELECTION IN COVARIANCE-STRUCTURES ANALYSIS AND THE PROBLEM OF SAMPLE-SIZE - A CLARIFICATION [J].
CUDECK, R ;
HENLY, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 109 (03) :512-519