Impact of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation on sphincter of Oddi function: a prospective randomized study

被引:42
作者
Cheon, Young Koog [1 ]
Lee, Tae Yoon [1 ]
Kim, Soo-Nyung [2 ]
Shim, Chan Sup [1 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Digest Dis, Dept Internal Med, 120-1 Neungdong Ro, Seoul 05030, South Korea
[2] Konkuk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
BILE-DUCT STONES; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; MULTICENTER SERIES; PRESERVE SPHINCTER; REMOVAL; PAPILLOTOMY; DILATATION; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.031
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (<= 8 mm in diameter) preserves sphincter of Oddi (SO) function. However, it is still unknown whether papillary function is preserved after endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD, >= 12 mm in diameter). We investigated SO function after EPLBD with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) by endoscopic manometry, up to 1 year after the procedure. Methods: This was a prospective randomized study involving patients with bile duct stones >= 12 mm. Eighty-six patients who met the inclusion criteria were assigned randomly to either EPLBD alone or EST with EPLBD, and endoscopic manometric studies were performed. The primary outcome was comparison of the manometric data between the 2 groups and within each group both 1 week and 1 year after the procedure. Results: One week after EPLBD alone and EST with EPLBD, the basal pressure of SO dropped from 30.4 (8.2) to 6.4 (8.4) mm Hg (P < .001) and 29.5 (18.9) to 2.9 (3.6) mm Hg (P < .001), respectively. SO function was not recovered at 1 year; the manometric measurements were similar to those taken at the 1-week time point in both groups. Similar outcomes were obtained in patients with EPLBD alone compared with those with EST and EPLBD, including the initial stone clearance rate (95.2% vs 97.7%, P = .612), the frequency of mechanical lithotripsy (21.4% vs 13.6%), and overall adverse events (11.9% vs 13.6%, P = 1.0) including the rate of pancreatitis after the procedure (7.1% vs 11.4%, P = .714). During an overall median follow-up of 17.8 months, the recurrence rate of bile duct stones was 16.7% in patients who underwent EPLBD alone and 15.9% in patients who underwent EST with EPLBD (P = .924). Conclusions: Both EPLBD alone and EST + EPLBD resulted in persistent and comparable loss of SO function after 1 year. EPLBD alone has similar efficacy and safety to those of EST with EPLBD with respect to removal of large stones.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy
    Ando, T
    Tsuyuguchi, T
    Okugawa, T
    Saito, M
    Ishihara, T
    Yamaguchi, T
    Saisho, H
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [2] Large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation to aid in endoscopic bile duct stone removal: a multicenter series
    Attasaranya, Siriboon
    Cheon, Young Koog
    Vittal, Harsha
    Howell, Douglas A.
    Wakelin, Donald E.
    Cunningham, John T.
    Ajmere, Niraj
    Marie, Ronald W. Ste, Jr.
    Bhattacharya, Kanishka
    Gupta, Kapil
    Freeman, Martin L.
    Sherman, Stuart
    McHenry, Lee
    Watkins, James L.
    Fogel, Evan L.
    Schmidt, Suzette
    Lehman, Glen A.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (07) : 1046 - 1052
  • [3] Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age
    Bergman, JJGHM
    vanderMey, S
    Rauws, EAJ
    Tijssen, JGP
    Gouma, DJ
    Tytgat, GNJ
    Huibregtse, K
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (06) : 643 - 649
  • [5] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS
    COTTON, PB
    LEHMAN, G
    VENNES, J
    GEENEN, JE
    RUSSELL, RCG
    MEYERS, WC
    LIGUORY, C
    NICKL, N
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) : 383 - 393
  • [6] Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract
    Ersoz, G
    Tekesin, O
    Ozutemiz, AO
    Gunsar, F
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (02) : 156 - 159
  • [7] GEENEN JE, 1984, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V87, P754
  • [8] ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC AND BILIARY MANOMETRY IN PANCREATIC, BILIARY, AND PAPILLARY DISEASE, AND AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY AND SURGICAL SPHINCTEROPLASTY
    GREGG, JA
    CARRLOCKE, DL
    [J]. GUT, 1984, 25 (11) : 1247 - 1254
  • [9] Ha Dong Woo, 2011, Korean J Gastroenterol, V57, P352
  • [10] Effects of large-balloon dilation on the major duodenal papilla and the lower bile duct: histological evaluation by using an ex vivo adult porcine model
    Hisatomi, Kantaro
    Ohno, Akiko
    Tabei, Kouichi
    Kubota, Kensuke
    Matsuhashi, Nobuyuki
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (02) : 366 - 372