The Evolution of Offspring Size across Life-History Stages

被引:28
作者
Kindsvater, Holly K. [1 ]
Otto, Sarah P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Biodivers Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
egg size; seed size; fecundity; costs of reproduction; maternal effect; matrix model; age-structured populations; EGG SIZE; PARENTAL CARE; LEAST KILLIFISH; MATERNAL AGE; CLUTCH SIZE; SEED SIZE; REPRODUCTION; SURVIVAL; MOTHERS; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1086/678248
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Females vary in the size of offspring that they produce, often in a manner that depends on maternal age or stage. This is puzzling, given that offspring size is predicted to evolve to a single optimal value where the gain in fitness from being larger exactly offsets the fitness lost to the mother by producing fewer offspring. We used a stage-structured life-history model to determine the optimal offspring size for females in different stages. We found that optimal offspring size does not vary with maternal stage when offspring fitness depends only on its size and not on the stage of the mother. This negative result holds even with density dependence, when larger offspring compete better. However, a trade-off between offspring size and maternal survival affects the optimal offspring size. The future reproductive value of the female, coupled with the costs and benefits of offspring investment, drives the evolution of stage-dependent offspring size. If producing larger offspring is riskier for mothers, females produce smaller offspring when their reproductive value in the next time step is large relative to current reproductive prospects. These analyses provide a novel framework for understanding why offspring size varies in age- and stage-structured populations.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 555
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   Game-theoretical evolution of seed mass in multi-species ecological models [J].
Rees, M ;
Westoby, M .
OIKOS, 1997, 78 (01) :116-126
[42]  
REZNICK D, 1982, EVOLUTION, V36, P160, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05021.x
[43]   The relationship between offspring size and fitness: integrating theory and empiricism [J].
Rollinson, Njal ;
Hutchings, Jeffrey A. .
ECOLOGY, 2013, 94 (02) :315-324
[44]   Body size-specific maternal effects on the offspring environment shape juvenile phenotypes in Atlantic salmon [J].
Rollinson, Njal ;
Hutchings, Jeffrey A. .
OECOLOGIA, 2011, 166 (04) :889-898
[45]   Why do large mothers produce large offspring? Theory and a test [J].
Sakai, S ;
Harada, Y .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2001, 157 (03) :348-359
[46]   PARENTAL CARE AND THE EVOLUTION OF EGG SIZE IN FISHES [J].
SARGENT, RC ;
TAYLOR, PD ;
GROSS, MR .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1987, 129 (01) :32-46
[47]   Assessing the roles of population density and predation risk in the evolution of offspring size in populations of a placental fish [J].
Schrader, Matthew ;
Travis, Joseph .
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 2 (07) :1480-1490
[48]   DO EMBRYOS INFLUENCE MATERNAL INVESTMENT? EVALUATING MATERNAL-FETAL COADAPTATION AND THE POTENTIAL FOR PARENT-OFFSPRING CONFLICT IN A PLACENTAL FISH [J].
Schrader, Matthew ;
Travis, Joseph .
EVOLUTION, 2009, 63 (11) :2805-2815
[49]   ALTERNATIVE MODELS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF OFFSPRING SIZE [J].
SHINE, R .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1989, 134 (02) :311-317
[50]   OPTIMAL BALANCE BETWEEN SIZE AND NUMBER OF OFFSPRING [J].
SMITH, CC ;
FRETWELL, SD .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1974, 108 (962) :499-506