The Evolution of Offspring Size across Life-History Stages

被引:28
作者
Kindsvater, Holly K. [1 ]
Otto, Sarah P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Biodivers Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
egg size; seed size; fecundity; costs of reproduction; maternal effect; matrix model; age-structured populations; EGG SIZE; PARENTAL CARE; LEAST KILLIFISH; MATERNAL AGE; CLUTCH SIZE; SEED SIZE; REPRODUCTION; SURVIVAL; MOTHERS; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1086/678248
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Females vary in the size of offspring that they produce, often in a manner that depends on maternal age or stage. This is puzzling, given that offspring size is predicted to evolve to a single optimal value where the gain in fitness from being larger exactly offsets the fitness lost to the mother by producing fewer offspring. We used a stage-structured life-history model to determine the optimal offspring size for females in different stages. We found that optimal offspring size does not vary with maternal stage when offspring fitness depends only on its size and not on the stage of the mother. This negative result holds even with density dependence, when larger offspring compete better. However, a trade-off between offspring size and maternal survival affects the optimal offspring size. The future reproductive value of the female, coupled with the costs and benefits of offspring investment, drives the evolution of stage-dependent offspring size. If producing larger offspring is riskier for mothers, females produce smaller offspring when their reproductive value in the next time step is large relative to current reproductive prospects. These analyses provide a novel framework for understanding why offspring size varies in age- and stage-structured populations.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 555
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Offspring size plasticity in response to intraspecific competition: An adaptive maternal effect across life-history stages [J].
Allen, Richard M. ;
Buckley, Yvonne M. ;
Marshall, Dustin J. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2008, 171 (02) :225-237
[2]   Competition as a selective mechanism for larger offspring size in guppies [J].
Bashey, Farrah .
OIKOS, 2008, 117 (01) :104-113
[3]   SHOULD EGG SIZE AND CLUTCH SIZE DECREASE WITH AGE [J].
BEGON, M ;
PARKER, GA .
OIKOS, 1986, 47 (03) :293-302
[4]   Maternal effects mediated by maternal age: from life histories to population dynamics [J].
Benton, T. G. ;
St Clair, J. J. H. ;
Plaistow, S. J. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 77 (05) :1038-1046
[5]   Maternal age as a determinant of larval growth and survival in a marine fish, Sebastes melanops [J].
Berkeley, SA ;
Chapman, C ;
Sogard, SM .
ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (05) :1258-1264
[6]  
Bernardo J, 1996, AM ZOOL, V36, P216
[7]   Costs of dispersal alter optimal offspring size in patchy habitats: combining theory and data for a marine invertebrate [J].
Burgess, Scott C. ;
Bode, Michael ;
Marshall, Dustin J. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) :757-765
[8]  
Charnov EL, 2002, EVOL ECOL RES, V4, P749
[9]  
Clutton-Brock T, 2016, Mammal societies, DOI DOI 10.104641420-9101.1992.5040719.X
[10]   Does within-population variation in fish egg size reflect maternal influences on optimal values? [J].
Einum, S ;
Fleming, IA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 160 (06) :756-765