Evaluation of EDTA salts for potential application to draw solute of a forward osmosis process

被引:2
作者
Lee, Seun-Woo [1 ]
Jang, Am [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ SKKU, Grad Sch Water Resources, 2066 Seobu Ro, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Forward osmosis; Draw solution; EDTA; Nanofiltration; Recovery of draw solution; AMMONIA-CARBON DIOXIDE; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; IONIC-STRENGTH; FEED SOLUTION; DESALINATION; MEMBRANE; PH; REJECTION; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2017.20680
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The selection of novel draw solution is one of the critical research fields in a forward osmosis (FO) process. Among various materials, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was suggested as a good candidate for draw solution due to its high solubility and easy recovery. However, it is important to find the optimum pH of EDTA in the FO process since EDTA form can be changed according to pH values. This study was initiated to find the optimal pH value of the EDTA salt used as a draw solution, as well as to explore the possibility to recover it by using the nanofiltration (NF) process. From the results of this study, the pH value that has the lowest amount of reverse salt flux (RSF) of EDTA and Na+ ions was found to be 7. In case of the rejection rate test of the NF process, two different membranes, each made with different materials, were used (cellulose acetate [CA] membrane and polyamide [PA] membrane). Both of the membranes have high rejection rate, which is over 99.15% at low pressure (5 bar). From the result of water flux, the performance of PA membrane was about twice as good as the CA membrane under all pressures (5, 10, 15 bar). It could be concluded that the EDTA salt has high water flux with low RSF in the FO process as well as the high salt rejection rate in the NF process. In addition, use of the PA membrane is much preferred than the CA membrane for EDTA salt recovery in the NF process.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Selection of potential fertilizer draw solution for fertilizer drawn forward osmosis application in Egypt
    Nasr, Peter
    Sewilam, Hani
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 65 : 22 - 30
  • [12] Synthesis and Application of Ethylenediamine Tetrapropionic Salt as a Novel Draw Solute for Forward Osmosis Application
    Long, Qingwu
    Qi, Guangxian
    Wang, Yan
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2015, 61 (04) : 1309 - 1321
  • [13] Osmotic's potential: An overview of draw solutes for forward osmosis
    Johnson, Daniel James
    Suwaileh, Wafa Ali
    Mohammed, Abdul Wahab
    Hilal, Nidal
    DESALINATION, 2018, 434 : 100 - 120
  • [14] Evaluation of poly (aspartic acid sodium salt) as a draw solute for forward osmosis
    Gwak, Gimun
    Jung, Bokyung
    Han, Sungsoo
    Hong, Seungkwan
    WATER RESEARCH, 2015, 80 : 294 - 305
  • [15] Potential of dyes as draw solutions in forward osmosis for the South African textile industry
    Sheldon, Marshall
    Jingxi, Estella Zandile
    De Jager, Debbie
    Augustine, Robyn
    Korenak, Jasmina
    Helix-Nielsen, C.
    Petrinic, Irena
    WATER SA, 2018, 44 (02) : 258 - 268
  • [16] Forward osmosis using dimethyl ether as a draw solute
    Sato, Nagahisa
    Sato, Yuya
    Yanase, Satoshi
    DESALINATION, 2014, 349 : 102 - 105
  • [17] Evaluation of citrate-coated magnetic nanoparticles as draw solute for forward osmosis
    Na, Yonghun
    Yang, Seungheon
    Le, Seockheon
    DESALINATION, 2014, 347 : 34 - 42
  • [18] Forward osmosis desalination by utilizing chlorhexidine gluconate based mouthwash as a reusable draw solute
    Ray, Saikat Sinha
    Chen, Shiao-Shing
    Nguyen Cong Nguyen
    Hau Thi Nguyen
    Li, Chi-Wang
    Wang, Jing
    Yan, Bin
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 304 : 962 - 969
  • [19] A study of a ferric-lactate complex as draw solute in forward osmosis
    Yu, Mingchuan
    Zhang, Hanmin
    Yang, Fenglin
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2017, 314 : 132 - 138
  • [20] A method to find an optimal draw solute for cost-effective FO(forward osmosis) desalination process
    Tae-wooKim
    Kim, Young
    Yun, Choamun
    Jang, Hong
    Kim, Woohyun
    Park, Sunwon
    11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, PTS A AND B, 2012, 31 : 1452 - 1456