Developing timely insights into comparative effectiveness research with a text-mining pipeline

被引:14
作者
Chang, Meiping [1 ]
Chang, Man [2 ]
Reed, Jane Z. [3 ]
Milward, David [3 ]
Xu, Jinghai James [4 ]
Cornell, Wendy D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Merck & Co Inc, Informat IT, Boston, MA USA
[2] Linguamatics, Westborough, MA USA
[3] Linguamatics, Cambridge, England
[4] Merck & Co Inc, Corp Dev, Kenilworth, NJ USA
[5] Merck & Co Inc, Informat IT, Rahway, NJ 07065 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CLINICALTRIALS.GOV; PERSPECTIVES; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.drudis.2016.01.012
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) provides evidence for the relative effectiveness and risks of different treatment options and informs decisions made by healthcare providers, payers, and pharmaceutical companies. CER data come from retrospective analyses as well as prospective clinical trials. Here, we describe the development of a text-mining pipeline based on natural language processing (NLP) that extracts key information from three different trial data sources: NIH ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Citeline Trialtrove. The pipeline leverages tailored terminologies to produce an integrated and structured output, capturing any trials in which pharmaceutical products of interest are compared with another therapy. The timely information alerts generated by this system provide the earliest and most complete picture of emerging clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 480
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov [J].
Anderson, Monique L. ;
Chiswell, Karen ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Tasneem, Asba ;
Topping, James ;
Califf, Robert M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (11) :1031-1039
[2]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, REC COND REP ED PUBL
[4]   A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov [J].
Bell, Stuart A. ;
Smith, Catrin Tudur .
ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2014, 9 :170
[5]   Can the pharmaceutical industry embrace comparative effectiveness research? A view from inside [J].
Berger, Marc L. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (05) :565-568
[6]  
Bourgeois P. T., 2012, PLOS ONE, V7
[7]   Three Perspectives on the Impact of Comparative Effectiveness Research on Decision Making Introduction [J].
Brixner, Diana I. ;
Oderda, Gary .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2012, 18 (04) :S3-S4
[8]   RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS - PERSPECTIVES ON SOME RECENT IDEAS [J].
BYAR, DP ;
SIMON, RM ;
FRIEDEWALD, WT ;
SCHLESSELMAN, JJ ;
DEMETS, DL ;
ELLENBERG, JH ;
GAIL, MH ;
WARE, JH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 295 (02) :74-80
[9]  
Califf R. M., 2012, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V307, P838
[10]   Use of ClinicalTrials.gov to Estimate Condition-Specific Nocebo Effects and Other Factors Affecting Outcomes of Analgesic Trials [J].
Cepeda, M. Soledad ;
Lobanov, Victor ;
Berlin, Jesse A. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 14 (04) :405-411