Power, influence, and policy in Arizona's education market: "We've got to out-charter the charters"

被引:3
作者
Potterton, Amanda U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Educ, 111 Dickey Hall, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
School choice; charter schools; education policy; privatization; community organizing; qualitative methods; POLITICS; NEOLIBERALISM;
D O I
10.1177/1757743818816712
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Arizona's "Wild West," free-market education approach via school-choice policies reflects the expansion of neo-liberal reforms, which emphasize private provision and governance of public services once markets are established. Indeed, charter schools, tax credit programs for public (state) and private schools, inter-district open enrolment, and neovouchers are changing Arizona's traditional public school systems and the communities where they are situated. It is known that new, incentivist market-based systems can result in decreased democratic school accountability and the thinning of collective democratic political actions. Further, the rapid entry and growth of not-for-profit and profit-making charter schools and education management organizations in the USA raises questions about equitable student access. It is not fully understood, however, how mature school-choice systems affect local communities "on the ground"-that is, how are school policies understood and acted out? This study employed ethnographic methods to analyze the perceptions and actions of community stakeholders in Arizona, including school leaders, teachers, parents, students, and institution and community organizers, at one district public school and in its surrounding community, including its charter schools. The author examines issues of power, since all community actors are not equally able to engage in school-choice practices.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 308
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Privatizing Schooling and Policy Making: The American Legislative Exchange Council and New Political and Discursive Strategies of Education Governance [J].
Anderson, Gary L. ;
Donchik, Liliana Montoro .
EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2016, 30 (02) :322-364
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CHARTER SCH RACE URB
[3]  
Apple M.W., 2012, The Assault On Public Education: Confronting the politics of corporate school reform
[4]   Understanding and Interrupting Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism in Education [J].
Apple, Michael W. .
PEDAGOGIES, 2006, 1 (01) :21-26
[5]  
Archer M. S., 1995, Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511557675, 10.1017/CBO9780511557675]
[6]  
Ball S., 2003, CLASS STRATEGIES ED
[7]  
Ball S.J., 1996, J EDUC POLICY, V11, P89, DOI DOI 10.1080/0268093960110105
[8]  
Berliner D.C. Biddle., 1995, MANUFACTURED CRISIS
[9]  
Buras K., 2012, The assault on public education: confronting the politics of corporate school reform, P160
[10]   REFORMING EDUCATIONAL POLICY WITH APPLIED SOCIAL RESEARCH [J].
COHEN, DK .
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1975, 45 (01) :17-43