Integrating Model-Driven and Data-Driven Techniques for Analyzing Learning Behaviors in Open-Ended Learning Environments

被引:45
作者
Kinnebrew, John S. [1 ]
Segedy, James R. [1 ]
Biswas, Gautam [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, EECS Dept, Inst Software Integrated Syst, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2017年 / 10卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Open-ended learning; environments; modeling learner; behaviors; hierarchical task modeling; activity sequence mining; coherence analysis; strategy modeling;
D O I
10.1109/TLT.2015.2513387
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Research in computer-based learning environments has long recognized the vital role of adaptivity in promoting effective, individualized learning among students. Adaptive scaffolding capabilities are particularly important in open-ended learning environments, which provide students with opportunities for solving authentic and complex problems, and the choice to adopt a variety of strategies and approaches to solving these problems. To help students overcome their difficulties and become effective learners and problem solvers, we have to develop methods that can track and interpret students' open-ended learning and problem-solving behaviors. The complexity of the problems and the open-ended nature of the solution processes pose considerable challenges to accurately interpret and evaluate student behaviors and performance as they work on the system. In this paper, we develop a framework that combines model-driven strategy detection with data-driven pattern discovery for analyzing students' learning activity data in open-ended environments. We present results from an in-depth case study of multiple activity patterns identified in data from the Betty's Brain learning environment. The results illustrate the benefits of combining model-and data-driven techniques to precisely characterize the learning behavior of students in an open-ended environment.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 153
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
AGRAWAL R, 1995, PROC INT CONF DATA, P3, DOI 10.1109/ICDE.1995.380415
[2]  
Aleven V., 2006, I. J. Artif. Intell. Educ, V16, P101
[3]  
Amershi S., 2009, J ED DATA MINING, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3554659
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HDB ED PSYCHOL
[5]  
Baker R, 2014, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2ND EDITION, P253
[6]  
Biswas G., 2014, DESIGN RECOMMENDATIO, V2, P135
[7]  
Biswas G., 2014, 16 INT C HUM COMP IN
[8]  
Bouchet F., 2013, Journal of Educational Data Mining, V5, P104
[9]   Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications [J].
Bransford, JD ;
Schwartz, DL .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 24 1999, 1999, 24 :61-100
[10]  
Brin S., 1997, SIGMOD Record, V26, P255, DOI [10.1145/253262.253327, 10.1145/253262.253325]