OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers

被引:28
作者
Specchia, Maria Lucia [1 ]
La Torre, Giuseppe [2 ]
Siliquini, Roberta [3 ]
Capizzi, Silvio [1 ]
Valerio, Luca [1 ]
Nardella, Pierangela [1 ]
Campana, Alessandro [4 ]
Ricciardi, Walter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Inst Hyg, Clin Governance Unit, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Clin Med & Publ Hlth Unit, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Dept Microbiol & Publ Hlth, Turin, Italy
[4] Eurogrp Consulting, Rome, Italy
关键词
JOINT COMMISSION; QUALITY; CARE; ACCREDITATION; NHS; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-10-174
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy. OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of CG within healthcare organizations. The aim of this paper is to explain the process underlying the development of OPTIGOV, and describe its characteristics and steps. Methods: OPTIGOV was developed in 2006 by the Institute of Hygiene of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart and Eurogroup Consulting Alliance. The main steps of the process were: choice of areas for analysis and questionnaire development, based on a review of scientific literature; assignment of scores and weights to individual questions and areas; implementation of a software interfaceable with Microsoft Office. Results: OPTIGOV consists of: a) a hospital audit with a structured approach; b) development of an improvement operational plan. A questionnaire divided into 13 areas of analysis is used. For each area there is a form with a variable number of questions and "closed" answers. A score is assigned to each answer, area of analysis, healthcare department and unit. The single scores can be gathered for the organization as a whole. The software application allows for collation of data, calculation of scores and development of benchmarks to allow comparisons between healthcare organizations. Implementation consists of three stages: the preparation phase includes a kick off meeting, selection of interviewees and development of a survey plan. The registration phase includes hospital audits, reviewing of hospital documentation, data collection and score processing. Lastly, results are processed, inserted into a final report, and discussed in a meeting with the Hospital Board and in a final workshop. Conclusions: The OPTIGOV methodology for the evaluation of CG implementation was developed with an evidence-based approach. The ongoing adoption of OPTIGOV in several projects will put to the test its potential to realistically represent the organization status, pinpoint criticalities and transferable best practices, provide a plan for improvement, and contribute to triggering changes and pursuit of quality in health care.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Accountability for clinical governance: developing collective responsibility for quality in primary care [J].
Allen, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7261) :608-611
[2]  
[Anonymous], EVIDENCE BASED MED P
[3]  
*ASS SAN REG EM RO, 1999, PIAN SAN REG 1999 20
[4]  
Ayres P.J., 1998, CLIN MANAGEMENT, V7, P106
[5]   Experiences of health professionals who conducted root cause analyses after undergoing a safety improvement programme [J].
Braithwaite, Jeffrey ;
Westbrook, Mary T. ;
Mallock, Nadine A. ;
Travaglia, Joanne F. ;
Iedema, Rick A. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (06) :393-399
[6]   An empirical assessment of social structural and cultural change in clinical directorates [J].
Braithwaite, Jeffrey .
HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (04) :185-193
[7]  
CARTER YH, 2002, OCCAS PAP R COLL GEN, V3, P1
[8]  
Collopy B T, 2000, J Qual Clin Pract, V20, P36, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00346.x
[9]   Developing effective clinical audit [J].
Davies, HTO .
HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1999, 60 (10) :748-750
[10]   Re-energising Clinical Governance through Integrated Governance [J].
Deighan, M ;
Bullivant, J .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2006, 44 (06) :692-693