Understanding Social Cohesion from the Perspective of the Host Community: Turkey Example

被引:2
作者
Seyidov, Ilgar [1 ]
机构
[1] Atilim Univ, Sch Business Publ Relat & Advertising, Ankara, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF ECONOMY CULTURE AND SOCIETY | 2021年 / 63期
关键词
Syrian refugee; Social cohesion; Host community; In-depth interview; Turkey; DURKHEIM;
D O I
10.26650/JECS2020-0061
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
According to recent statistics from the DGMM (Directorate General of Migration Management of Turkey), more than 3,5 million Syrian refugee people are living in Turkey. This number, however, reflects only registered Syrians, not the many unregistered Syrian refugees and asylum-seekers also living in Turkey. In order to cope with the refugee crisis, various projects are being conducted through the support of national and international funds. Social cohesion has been identified as a key to integrating host and refugee communities. Socio-cultural activities hve been designed to include participants from both communities. In this context, this study aims to discover the attitudes of Turks toward social cohesion which is promoted to be built between them and refugees. This limited research relied on a semi-structured in-depth interview technique as research methodology for a random sample of 45 residents of Ankara living in neighborhoods that contain a high number of refugees. The main reason of limiting the number of participants with 45 was related to reputation. According to findings, the members of the host community are in favor of developing social contact with refugees; however, misinformation and rumors, language barriers, and a lack of social connection were considered as the main factors affecting the negative attitudes of the host community members towards refugees.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 125
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Grimalda G.T. N., 2018, Social cohesion, global governance and the future of politics: Understanding and fostering social cohesion
  • [32] Helliwell JohnF., 2011, International Journal of Wellbeing, V1, P42, DOI [DOI 10.5502/IJW.V1I1.9, 10.3386/w15911, DOI 10.5502/IJW.V1I1.3, 10.5502/ijw.v1i1.9, DOI 10.3386/W15911]
  • [33] Icduygu A., 2015, SYRIAN REFUGES TURKE
  • [34] Social cohesion and integration: learning active citizenship
    Jansen, T
    Chioncel, N
    Dekkers, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2006, 27 (02) : 189 - 205
  • [35] Kagnici Y D., 2017, Elementary Education Online, V16, P1768, DOI DOI 10.17051/ILKONLINE.2017.342990
  • [36] Karasu M. A., 2016, Sleyman Demirel niversitesi ktisadi Ve dari Bilimler Fakltesi Dergisi, V21, P995
  • [37] Social well-being
    Keyes, CLM
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1998, 61 (02) : 121 - 140
  • [38] Larsen C.A., 2014, SOCIAL COHESION DEFI
  • [39] Lazarev E, 2017, POLIT SCI RES METH, V5, P201, DOI 10.1017/psrm.2015.57
  • [40] Lindloff R.T., 2011, Qualitative Communication Research Methods