Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review

被引:3
作者
Malige, Ajith [1 ]
Beck, Matthew [2 ]
Mun, Frederick [3 ]
Goss, Maddie [3 ]
Boateng, Henry [3 ]
Nwachuku, Chinenye [1 ]
机构
[1] St Lukes Univ Hlth Network, Orthopaed Surg, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Orthopaed Surg, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
cerclage; arthroplasty; fracture; femur; periprosthetic; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FEMORAL FRACTURES; RISK-FACTORS; FIXATION; NONUNION; SYSTEM; CABLES;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.25063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: While biomechanical and clinical studies detailing the equivalence and, sometimes, the superiority of cerclage wiring fixation compared to plate fixation in select fractures (Vancouver B1 and C) exist, no studies exist detailing outcomes after cerclage wiring fixation in all Vancouver B fracture types. This study explores whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes between Vancouver B fractures fixed with cerclage wiring and those without. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study reviewed 295 patients from 2007 to 2018 with periprosthetic femur fractures. Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures stabilized utilizing cerclage wiring were identified and compared against fractures stabilized without cerclage wiring, with 33% being B1, 48.4% B2, and 18.6% 03 fractures. Demographics, injury details, fracture classification, surgical details, fracture union, and postoperative complications were recorded for each patient. Results: A majority of our patients were females (65.9%) and were older than 71 years of age (65.6%) without diabetes (63.3%) or smoking history (92.2%). Sixty-nine patients progressed to fracture union (76.7%), two (2.2%) to delayed union, and 19 (21.1%) to nonunion. There was no difference in the union rate (p = 0.98) or time to union (p = 0.91) between the fixation methods. Finally, there was no difference in the infection rate (p = 0.81), re-fracture rate (p = 0.87), or re-operation rate (p = 0.75) between the fixation methods. Conclusion: Periprosthetic femur fractures are common injuries, most commonly occurring after low-energy mechanisms in the elderly female population. While the Vancouver fracture pattern helps to guide the surgical construct used for fixation, the use of cerclage wires does not impact bony union in these injuries. Interestingly, increasing age and female gender were associated with increased union rates. Surgeons should individually consider each patient's demographic as well as fracture type when deciding which construct will achieve stable fixation that allows for fracture healing.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Past and present of the use of cerclage wires in orthopedics
    Angelini A.
    Battiato C.
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (4) : 623 - 635
  • [2] Percutaneous cerclage wiring, does it disrupt femoral blood supply? A cadaveric injection study
    Apivatthakakul, T.
    Phaliphot, J.
    Leuvitoonvechkit, S.
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2013, 44 (02): : 168 - 174
  • [3] Cerclage wires or cables for the management of Intraoperative fracture associated with a cementless, tapered femoral prosthesis
    Berend, KR
    Lombardi, AV
    Mallory, TH
    Chonko, DJ
    Dodds, KL
    Adams, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (07) : 17 - 21
  • [4] Epidemiology - Hip and knee
    Berry, DJ
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 30 (02) : 183 - +
  • [5] BETHEA JS, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P95
  • [6] Risk factors contributing to fracture non-unions
    Calori, G. M.
    Albisetti, W.
    Agus, A.
    Iori, S.
    Tagliabue, L.
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2007, 38 : S11 - S18
  • [7] Surgical treatment of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES OF 1381 FRACTURES TREATED IN SWEDEN BETWEEN 2001 AND 2011
    Chatziagorou, G.
    Lindahl, H.
    Karrholm, J.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (11) : 1447 - 1458
  • [8] FITZGERALD RH, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P61
  • [9] Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture
    Franklin, John
    Malchau, Henrik
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2007, 38 (06): : 655 - 660
  • [10] FEMORAL FRACTURE FOLLOWING HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    FREDIN, HO
    LINDBERG, H
    CARLSSON, AS
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 58 (01): : 20 - 22