Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations

被引:251
作者
Dien, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Ctr Birth Defects, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
Principal components analysis; Independent components analysis; Event-related potentials; EVENT-RELATED-POTENTIALS; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; EMOTIONAL PICTURES; ANALYTIC ROTATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; AVERAGE REFERENCE; BLIND SEPARATION; RESPONSES; MISALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00885.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Principal components analysis (PCA) can facilitate analysis of event-related potential (ERP) components. Geomin, Oblimin, Varimax, Promax, and Infomax (independent components analysis) were compared using a simulated data set. Kappa settings for Oblimin and Promax were also systematically compared. Finally, the rotations were also analyzed in a two-step PCA procedure, including a contrast between spatiotemporal and temporospatial procedures. Promax was found to give the best overall results for temporal PCA, and Infomax was found to give the best overall results for spatial PCA. The current practice of kappa values of 3 or 4 for Promax and 0 for Oblimin was supported. Source analysis was meaningfully improved by temporal Promax PCA over the conventional windowed difference wave approach (from a median 32.9 mm error to 6.7 mm). It was also found that temporospatial PCA produced modestly improved results over spatiotemporal PCA.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 183
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Multivariate exploratory data analysis: A perspective on exploratory factor analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Educational and Psychological Measurement, DOI [10.1177/0013164404272507, DOI 10.1177/0013164404272507]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1962, Modern factor analysis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1935, Vectors of the Mind
[5]   Misallocation of variance in event-related potentials: simulation studies on the effects of test power, topography, and baseline-to-peak versus principal component quantifications [J].
Beauducel, A ;
Debener, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2003, 124 (01) :103-112
[6]   AN INFORMATION MAXIMIZATION APPROACH TO BLIND SEPARATION AND BLIND DECONVOLUTION [J].
BELL, AJ ;
SEJNOWSKI, TJ .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (06) :1129-1159
[7]   A THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE AVERAGE REFERENCE IN TOPOGRAPHIC EVOKED-POTENTIAL STUDIES [J].
BERTRAND, O ;
PERRIN, F ;
PERNIER, J .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (06) :462-464
[8]   An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis [J].
Browne, MW .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2001, 36 (01) :111-150
[9]   Comparison between Principal Component Analysis and independent component analysis in electroencephalograms modelling [J].
Bugli, C. ;
Lambert, P. .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 49 (02) :312-327
[10]   Voltage-based versus factor score-based source localization analyses of electrophysiological brain activity:: A comparison [J].
Carretié, L ;
Tapia, M ;
Mercado, F ;
Albert, J ;
López-Martín, S ;
de la Serna, JM .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2004, 17 (02) :109-115