Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures

被引:25
作者
Barber, Sarah J. [1 ,2 ]
Castrellon, Jaime J. [1 ]
Opitz, Philipp [1 ]
Mather, Mara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] San Francisco State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Francisco, CA 94132 USA
关键词
Group memory; Aging; Emotion; Collaborative inhibition; REPEATED MEMORY TESTS; AGE-DIFFERENCES; RETRIEVAL ORGANIZATION; SEMANTIC RELATEDNESS; STEREOTYPE THREAT; COLLECTIVE MEMORY; INHIBITION; BENEFITS; DISRUPTION; AROUSAL;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-017-0694-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although a group of people working together recalls more items than any one individual, they recall fewer unique items than the same number of people working apart whose responses are combined. This is known as collaborative inhibition, and it is a robust effect that occurs for both younger and older adults. However, almost all previous studies documenting collaborative inhibition have used stimuli that were neutral in emotional valence, low in arousal, and studied by all group members. In the current experiments, we tested the impact of picture-stimuli valence, picture-stimuli arousal, and information distribution in modulating the magnitude of collaborative inhibition. We included both younger and older adults because there are age differences in how people remember emotional pictures that could modulate any effects of emotion on collaborative inhibition. Results revealed that when information was shared (i.e., studied by all group members), there were robust collaborative inhibition effects for both neutral and emotional stimuli for both younger and older adults. However, when information was unshared (i.e., studied by only a single group member), these effects were attenuated. Together, these results provide mixed support for the retrieval strategy disruption account of collaborative inhibition. Supporting the retrieval strategy disruption account, unshared study information was less susceptible to collaborative inhibition than shared study information. Contradicting the retrieval strategy disruption account, emotional valence and arousal did not modulate the magnitude of collaborative inhibition despite the fact that participants clustered the emotional, but not neutral, information together in memory.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 730
页数:15
相关论文
共 110 条
[91]   Investigating the role of emotion during the search process in free recall [J].
Siddiqui, Aisha P. ;
Unsworth, Nash .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2011, 39 (08) :1387-1400
[92]   AN EXAMINATION OF TRACE STORAGE IN FREE RECALL [J].
SLAMECKA, NJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 76 (4P1) :504-&
[93]   Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members [J].
Stasser, G ;
Vaughan, SI ;
Stewart, DD .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :102-116
[94]   Hidden profiles: A brief history [J].
Stasser, G ;
Titus, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2003, 14 (3-4) :304-313
[95]   Serial position effects and the picture-superiority effect in the group recall of unshared information [J].
Stewart, DD ;
Stewart, CB ;
Tyson, C ;
Vinci, G ;
Fioti, T .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2004, 8 (03) :166-181
[96]   Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words? [J].
Talmi, D ;
Moscovitch, M .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (05) :742-751
[97]   The role of attention and relatedness in emotionally enhanced memory [J].
Talmi, Deborah ;
Schimmack, Ulrich ;
Paterson, Theone ;
Moscovitch, Morris .
EMOTION, 2007, 7 (01) :89-102
[98]   AVAILABILITY VERSUS ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION IN MEMORY FOR WORDS [J].
TULVING, E ;
PEARLSTONE, Z .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1966, 5 (04) :381-+
[99]  
Tulving E., 1965, PSYCHON SCI, V3, P337
[100]   Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more [J].
Vredeveldt, Annelies ;
Hildebrandt, Alieke ;
van Koppen, Peter J. .
MEMORY, 2016, 24 (05) :669-682