Comparison of Cross-Platform Flow Cytometry Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in Multiple Myeloma Using a Common Antibody Combination and Analysis Strategy

被引:11
|
作者
Mathis, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Chapuis, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Borgeot, Jessica [3 ]
Maynadie, Marc [3 ]
Fontenay, Michaela [1 ,2 ]
Bene, Marie-Christine [4 ]
Guy, Julien [3 ]
Bardet, Valerie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Paris Ctr Cochin, Serv Hematol Biol, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Hop Univ Paris Ctr Cochin, Inserm U1016, Paris, France
[3] CHU, Serv Hematol Biol, Dijon, France
[4] CHU Nantes, Serv Hematol Biol, F-44035 Nantes 01, France
关键词
multiple myeloma; minimal residual disease; multiparameter flow cytometry; seven-color; eight-antibody approach; PLASMA-CELLS; BONE-MARROW; TRANSPLANTATION; CRITERIA; THERAPY; PCR;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.b.21200
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundA seven-color/eight-antibody approach has recently been proposed for the minimal residual disease (MRD) determination in multiple myeloma (MM), which was developed on FACSCantoII instruments. This strategy should be also applicable on different multiparameter flow cytometers (MFC), but this needs to be demonstrated before moving MRD assessment to local flow cytometry core facilities, nearer to patients, thereby reducing the risk of cell losses induced by sample transportation and delays in cell processing. MethodsTo evaluate the comparability of testing the same seven-color/eight-antibody single-tube on any instruments, MRD was evaluated concomitantly on two distinct MFC in a cohort of 80 bone marrow MM samples (i.e., 73 patients including seven with two MRD evaluations) in two French centers, Paris-Cochin and Dijon. ResultsNo significant difference in the MM residual plasma-cells (MM-PCs) quantification was observed. Calculated on the basis of the whole amount of leukocytes assessed, the mean MRD percentage was, respectively, 0.1661% and 0.1458% using FACSCantoII or Navios instruments, with a very high correlation between instruments (r(2)=0.9798) and a very minimal bias (-0.02). Moreover, there was no difference in MRD interpretation at 10(-4) threshold; whereas three MRD interpretation discordances were observed at 2.5x10(-5) threshold. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that this MRD-detection strategy is transposable between harmonized seven-color instruments. This shows that a homogeneous rapid MRD evaluation can be performed in most MFC platforms, in the near vicinity of clinical wards. However, the clinical validation of this approach needs to be strengthened, as well as its relevance compared to molecular approaches. (c) 2014 International Clinical Cytometry Society
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 109
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: Benefits of flow cytometry
    Galtseva, I. V.
    Davydova, Y. O.
    Kapranov, N. M.
    Julhakyan, H. L.
    Mendeleeva, L. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 40 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [2] MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE MONITORING IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA USING POLYCHROMATIC FLOW CYTOMETRY
    Rihova, Lucie
    Varmuzova, Tamara
    Zarbochova, Pavla
    Suska, Renata
    Penka, Miroslav
    Hajek, Roman
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2012, 82B (06) : 404 - 405
  • [3] Comparison of mass spectrometry and flow cytometry in measuring minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma
    Foureau, David
    Bhutani, Manisha
    Guo, Fei
    Rigby, Katherine
    Leonidas, Marina
    Tjaden, Elise
    Fox, Andee
    Atrash, Shebli
    Paul, Barry
    Voorhees, Peter M.
    Usmani, Saad Z.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (20): : 6933 - 6936
  • [4] NEW STRATEGIES OF ANALYSIS WITH FLOW CYTOMETRY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    Beneit, P.
    Tarin, F.
    Mora, E.
    Villarrubia, B.
    Mauricio, A.
    Fernandez, Ma
    Salazar, S.
    Jose De Paz, F.
    Verdu, J.
    Sanchez, S.
    Sanchez-Majano, J.
    Castano, V.
    Fernandez, C.
    Blanes, M.
    Verdu, J. Juan V.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2013, 98 : 314 - 314
  • [5] Minimal Residual Disease Detection by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Why and How?
    Roshal, Mikhail
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 55 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [6] Regulatory Perspective on Minimal Residual Disease Flow Cytometry Testing in Multiple Myeloma
    Gormley, Nicole J.
    Turley, Danielle M.
    Dickey, Jennifer S.
    Farrell, Ann T.
    Reaman, Gregory H.
    Stafford, Elizabeth
    Carrington, Lea
    Marti, Gerald E.
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2016, 90 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [7] Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: flow cytometry is the method of choice
    Owen, RG
    Rawstron, AC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2005, 128 (05) : 732 - 733
  • [8] Minimal residual disease testing in multiple myeloma by flow cytometry: major heterogeneity
    Flanders, Aaron
    Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice
    Landgren, Ola
    BLOOD, 2013, 122 (06) : 1088 - 1089
  • [9] Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry
    Puig, N.
    Sarasquete, M. E.
    Balanzategui, A.
    Martinez, J.
    Paiva, B.
    Garcia, H.
    Fumero, S.
    Jimenez, C.
    Alcoceba, M.
    Chillon, M. C.
    Sebastian, E.
    Marin, L.
    Montalban, M. A.
    Mateos, M. V.
    Oriol, A.
    Palomera, L.
    de la Rubia, J.
    Vidriales, M. B.
    Blade, J.
    Lahuerta, J. J.
    Gonzalez, M.
    Miguel, J. F. S.
    Garcia-Sanz, R.
    LEUKEMIA, 2014, 28 (02) : 391 - 397
  • [10] Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry
    N Puig
    M E Sarasquete
    A Balanzategui
    J Martínez
    B Paiva
    H García
    S Fumero
    C Jiménez
    M Alcoceba
    M C Chillón
    E Sebastián
    L Marín
    M A Montalbán
    M V Mateos
    A Oriol
    L Palomera
    J de la Rubia
    M B Vidriales
    J Bladé
    J J Lahuerta
    M González
    J F S Miguel
    R García-Sanz
    Leukemia, 2014, 28 : 391 - 397