Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland

被引:62
|
作者
Love, Eleanor R. [2 ]
Bhattacharya, Siladitya [2 ]
Smith, Norman C. [3 ]
Bhattacharya, Sohinee [1 ]
机构
[1] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Dugald Baird Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2010年 / 341卷
关键词
LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION; SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; PRETERM DELIVERY; WOMEN; RISK; HEALTH; GRIEF;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.c3967
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval after miscarriage in a first recorded pregnancy. Design Population based retrospective cohort study. Setting Scottish hospitals between 1981 and 2000. Participants 30 937 women who had a miscarriage in their first recorded pregnancy and subsequently became pregnant. Main outcome measures The primary end point was miscarriage, live birth, termination, stillbirth, or ectopic pregnancy in the second pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were rates of caesarean section and preterm delivery, low birthweight infants, pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia, placental abruption, and induced labour in the second pregnancy. Results Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, those who conceived again within six months were less likely to have another miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.77), termination (0.43, 0.33 to 0.57), or ectopic pregnancy (0.48, 0.34 to 0.69). Women with an interpregnancy interval of more than 24 months were more likely to have an ectopic second pregnancy (1.97, 1.42 to 2.72) or termination (2.40, 1.91 to 3.01). Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, women who conceived again within six months and went on to have a live birth in the second pregnancy were less likely to have a caesarean section (0.90, 0.83 to 0.98), preterm delivery (0.89, 0.81 to 0.98), or infant of low birth weight (0.84, 0.71 to 0.89) but were more likely to have an induced labour (1.08, 1.02 to 1.23). Conclusions Women who conceive within six months of an initial miscarriage have the best reproductive outcomes and lowest complication rates in a subsequent pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Interpregnancy interval following miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kangatharan, Chrishny
    Labram, Saffi
    Bhattacharya, Sohinee
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2017, 23 (02) : 221 - 231
  • [2] Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study
    Lawani, Lucky Osaheni
    Enebe, Joseph Tochukwu
    Eze, Paul
    Igboke, Francis Nwabueze
    Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikeji
    Ugwu, Monica Omosivie
    Agu, Ujunwa Justina
    Onyinye, Enebe Nympha
    Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2022, 10
  • [3] Is there an ideal interpregnancy interval after a live birth, miscarriage or other adverse pregnancy outcomes?
    Sholapurkar, S. L.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 30 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [4] Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after recurrent pregnancy loss
    Bentolila, Yaara
    Ratzon, Ronit
    Shoham-Vardi, Ilana
    Serjienko, Ruslan
    Mazor, Moshe
    Bashiri, Asher
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (14) : 1459 - 1464
  • [5] Interpregnancy interval and singleton pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer
    Quinn, Molly M.
    Rosen, Mitchell P.
    Allen, Isabel Elaine
    Huddleston, Heather G.
    Cedars, Marcelle I.
    Fujimoto, Victor Y.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 111 (06) : 1145 - 1150
  • [6] The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss
    Wong, Luchin F.
    Schliep, Karen C.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mumford, Sunni L.
    Perkins, Neil J.
    Ye, Aijun
    Galai, Noya
    Wactawski-Wende, Jean
    Lynch, Anne M.
    Townsend, Janet M.
    Faraggi, David
    Schisterman, Enrique F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 375.e1 - 375.e11
  • [7] Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study
    Mahande, Michael J.
    Obure, Joseph
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [8] Interpregnancy Interval After Pregnancy Loss and Risk of Repeat Miscarriage
    Sundermann, Alexandra C.
    Hartmann, Katherine E.
    Jones, Sarah H.
    Torstenson, Eric S.
    Edwards, Digna R. Velez
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (06) : 1312 - 1318
  • [9] Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies
    Hanley, Gillian E.
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Kinniburgh, Brooke A.
    Lee, Lily
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (03) : 408 - 415
  • [10] Short interpregnancy interval can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Yumei
    Zeng, Can
    Chen, Yuhong
    Yang, Liu
    Tian, Di
    Liu, Xinghui
    Lin, Yonghong
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9