Agreement between laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based Framingham risk score in Southern Iran

被引:19
|
作者
Rezaei, Fatemeh [1 ]
Seif, Mozhgan [2 ]
Gandomkar, Abdullah [3 ]
Fattahi, Mohammad Reza [4 ]
Hasanzadeh, Jafar [5 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Noncommunicable Dis Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Gastroenterohepatol Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[5] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Hlth Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Epidemiol,Inst Hlth, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE RISK; PRIMARY PREVENTION; POPULATION HEALTH; GLOBAL BURDEN; IMPACT; COHORT; PREDICTION; PROFILE; FAT;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-90188-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Framingham 10-year cardiovascular disease risk is measured by laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based models. This study aimed to determine the agreement between these two models in a large population in Southern Iran. In this study, the baseline data of 8138 individuals participated in the Pars cohort study were used. The participants had no history of cardiovascular disease or stroke. For the laboratory-based risk model, scores were determined based on age, sex, current smoking, diabetes, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and treatment status, total cholesterol, and High-Density Lipoprotein. For the non-laboratory-based risk model, scores were determined based on age, sex, current smoking, diabetes, SBP and treatment status, and Body Mass Index. The agreement between these two models was determined by Bland Altman plots for agreement between the scores and kappa statistic for agreement across the risk groups. Bland Altman plots showed that the limits of agreement were reasonable for females <60 years old (95% CI: -2.27-4.61%), but of concern for those <greater than or equal to>60 years old (95% CI: -3.45-9.67%), males <60 years old (95% CI: -2.05-8.91%), and males <greater than or equal to>60 years old (95% CI: -3.01-15.23%). The limits of agreement were wider for males >= 60 years old in comparison to other age groups. According to the risk groups, the agreement was better in females than in males, which was moderate for females <60 years old (kappa=0.57) and those <greater than or equal to>60 years old (kappa=0.51). The agreement was fair for the males <60 years old (kappa=0.39) and slight for those <greater than or equal to>60 years old (Kappa=0.14). The results showed that in overall participants, the agreement between the two risk scores was moderate according to risk grouping. Therefore, our results suggest that the non-laboratory-based risk model can be used in resource-limited settings where individuals cannot afford laboratory tests and extensive laboratories are not available.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agreement between laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based Framingham risk score in Southern Iran
    Fatemeh Rezaei
    Mozhgan Seif
    Abdullah Gandomkar
    Mohammad Reza Fattahi
    Jafar Hasanzadeh
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [2] Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based CVD risk analysis
    Ballo, Piercarlo
    Bocelli, Arianna
    Mondillo, Sergio
    LANCET, 2008, 371 (9630): : 2081 - 2082
  • [3] Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based CVD risk analysis - Reply
    Gaziano, Thomas A.
    Gaziano, J. Michael
    LANCET, 2008, 371 (9630): : 2082 - 2083
  • [4] The WHO Cardiovascular Disease Risk (Non-Laboratory-Based) in a Selected Brazilian Population: Percentiles of Distribution And Agreement With Laboratory-Based Scores
    Cesena, Fernando Yue
    Generoso, Giuliano
    Santos, Itamar de S.
    Pereira, Alexandre C.
    Bittencourt, Marcio S.
    Santos, Raul D.
    Lotufo, Paulo A.
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2024, 121 (07) : 1 - 3
  • [5] Comparison of laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based cardiovascular risk prediction tools in rural India
    Birhanu, Mulugeta Molla
    Zengin, Ayse
    Evans, Roger G.
    Kim, Joosup
    Olaiya, Muideen T.
    Riddell, Michael A.
    Kalyanram, Kartik
    Kartik, Kamakshi
    Suresh, Oduru
    Thomas, Nihal
    Srikanth, Velandai K.
    Thrift, Amanda G.
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2025, 30 (01) : 57 - 64
  • [6] Agreement between the laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based WHO cardiovascular risk charts: a cross-sectional analysis of a national health survey in Peru
    Cristobal Guzman-Vilca, Wilmer
    Quispe-Villegas, Gustavo A.
    Vascones Roman, Fritz Fidel
    Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
    Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [7] Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based model in prediction of cardiovascular disease risk in elderly subjects
    Dhana, K.
    Ikram, M. A.
    Hofman, A.
    Franco, O. H.
    Kavousi, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 28 - 29
  • [8] SIMPLE NON-LABORATORY-BASED AND LABORATORY-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT ALGORITHMS AND NOMOGRAM FOR DETECTING UNDIAGNOSED DIABETES MELLITUS
    Wong, C. K. H.
    Siu, S. -C.
    Wan, Y. -F.
    Jiao, F. -F.
    Yu, E. Y. T.
    Fung, C. S. C.
    Wong, K. -W.
    Lam, C. L. K.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 106 : S103 - S103
  • [9] Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based World Health Organization risk equations for assessment of cardiovascular disease risk
    Dehghan, Azizallah
    Rayatinejad, Ali
    Khezri, Rozhan
    Aune, Dagfinn
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [10] Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based prediction of carotid plaque in Korean subjects
    Kim, Y. K.
    Kim, Y. S.
    Rhee, M. Y.
    Lee, M. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 137 : S40 - S40