Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study

被引:3
|
作者
Xiao, Lu [1 ]
Chu, Wen [1 ]
Wang, Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Luoyang Cent Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, 288 Zhongzhou Middle Rd, Luoyang 471000, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
clinical decision-making; color-coded duplex sonography; coronary artery disease; intracranial stenosis; invasive catheter angiography; magnetic resonance angiography; DIGITAL-SUBTRACTION-ANGIOGRAPHY; MR-ANGIOGRAPHY; RISK-FACTORS; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; PREVALENCE; DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS; ANEURYSMS; STROKE;
D O I
10.3892/etm.2019.8255
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Hemodynamic changes may provide important information for clinical decision-making in internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The degree of stenosis is responsible for the hemodynamic changes. For detection of intracranial stenosis, each diagnostic method has its own advantages and disadvantages. The goal of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and accuracy of color-coded duplex sonography with that of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the detection of intracranial stenosis. Patients with 3 vessels and/or left stem coronary artery disease were subjected to transcranial and extracranial color-coded duplex sonography (n=998), MRA (n=998) and invasive catheter angiography (n=939). The degree of stenosis was defined according to the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease methodology. A >= 50% reduction in artery diameter was considered as a positive obstructive lesion. The benefits of each imaging method were assessed by clinical decision-making analysis. Color-coded duplex sonography and MRA, had sensitivities of 0.935 and 0.957 and accuracies of 0.92 and 0.974, respectively, when using invasive catheter angiography as a gold standard. The number of false-positive obstructive lesions detected by MRA was significantly higher than that for color-coded duplex sonography (53 vs. 13, P<0.0001). Color-coded duplex sonography was able to detect an obstructive lesion in one single image for ICAs with >= 57% stenosis, while MRA was only capable of detecting an obstructive lesion in one single image for ICAs with >= 80% stenosis. In conclusion, color-coded duplex sonography is a reliable method for the detection of intracranial stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 480
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Left common and right internal carotid artery occlusion - color-coded duplex sonography and magnetic resonance angiography findings
    Zardi, EM
    Greco, F
    Zardi, DM
    Rollo, M
    Salvinelli, F
    Picardi, A
    Forno, GD
    Rossini, PM
    Afeltra, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 13 (04) : 423 - 424
  • [2] Detection of Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Using Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography, Computed Tomographic Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
    Roubec, Martin
    Kuliha, Martin
    Jonszta, Tomas
    Prochazka, Vaclav
    Fadrna, Tana
    Filip, Michal
    Kanovsky, Petr
    Langova, Katerina
    Herzig, Roman
    Skoloudik, David
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (08) : 1069 - 1075
  • [3] Internal carotid artery stenosis -: Comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
    Py, MO
    André, C
    de Azevedo, FS
    Domingues, RC
    Salomao, RF
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2001, 59 (3B) : 665 - 671
  • [4] Carotid artery stenting and follow-up: Value of 64-MSCT angiography as complementary imaging method to color-coded duplex sonography
    Nolz, Richard
    Wibmer, Andreas
    Beitzke, Dietrich
    Gentzsch, Stephan
    Willfort-Ehringer, Andrea
    Lammer, Johannes
    Thurnher, Majda
    Schoder, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [5] TRANSCRANIAL COLOR-CODED DUPLEX SONOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY, AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY - METHODS, APPLICATIONS, ADVANTAGES, AND LIMITATIONS
    BAUMGARTNER, RW
    MATTLE, HP
    AASLID, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1995, 23 (02) : 89 - 111
  • [6] Detection of moderate to severe middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis in stroke patients: Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography versus computed tomography angiography
    Toudou-Daouda, Moussa
    Chausson, Nicolas
    Smadja, Didier
    Alecu, Cosmin
    ULTRASOUND, 2024, 32 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [7] Automated detection of intracranial artery stenosis and occlusion in magnetic resonance angiography: A preliminary study based on deep learning
    Qiu, Jinming
    Tan, Guanru
    Lin, Yan
    Guan, Jitian
    Dai, Zhuozhi
    Wang, Fei
    Zhuang, Caiyu
    Wilman, Alan H.
    Huang, Huaidong
    Cao, Zhen
    Tang, Yanyan
    Jia, Yanlong
    Li, Yan
    Zhou, Teng
    Wu, Renhua
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 94 : 105 - 111
  • [8] Color Duplex Sonography in the Detection of Internal Carotid Artery Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy Comparison With Computed Tomographic Angiography
    Aleksic, Nikola
    Tanaskovic, Slobodan
    Radak, Sandra
    Mitrasinovic, Anka
    Kolar, Jovo
    Babic, Srdjan
    Otasevic, Petar
    Radak, Djordje
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (12) : 1677 - 1682
  • [9] Overestimation of the degree of stenosis in the intracranial internal carotid artery determined by magnetic resonance angiography compared to conventional arteriography
    Durán-Ferreras, E
    Schoeck, AP
    Barest, GD
    Viereck, JC
    Babikian, VL
    Kase, CS
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2003, 37 (08) : 730 - 732
  • [10] Intracranial internal carotid artery changes in acromegaly: a quantitative magnetic resonance angiography study
    Manara, Renzo
    Gabrieli, Joseph
    Citton, Valentina
    Ceccato, Filippo
    Rizzati, Silvia
    Bommarito, Giulia
    Briani, Chiara
    Della Puppa, Alessandro
    Dassie, Francesca
    Milanese, Laura
    Di Salle, Francesco
    Ermani, Mario
    Scaroni, Carla
    Martini, Chiara
    Maffei, Pietro
    PITUITARY, 2014, 17 (05) : 414 - 422