Spatial dynamics and morphological plasticity of common reed (Phragmites australis) and cattails (Typha sp.) in freshwater marshes and roadside ditches

被引:39
作者
Bellavance, Marie-Eve [1 ]
Brisson, Jacques [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Inst Rech Biol Vegetale, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ H1X 2B2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Common reed; Typha angustifolia; Typha latifolia; Interspecific competition; Morphological plasticity; Roadside ditch; Freshwater marsh; ST-LAWRENCE-RIVER; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; NORTHWESTERN INDIANA; CANADIAN WEEDS; NORTH-AMERICA; LATIFOLIA L; EX-STEUD; PLANTS; ANGUSTIFOLIA; WETLANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.04.003
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Over the last decades, the abundance of common reed has significantly increased in freshwater wetlands of eastern North America, and stands of this species are now commonly alternating with stands of cattails. Since these species share many characteristics, the contact zone between common reed and cattail stands may witness strong interspecific interactions. We surveyed stand dynamics in roadside ditches and freshwater marshes at these contact zones over three years, and we examined the morphological plasticity in response to neighbors. Results indicate that common reed is clearly gaining ground over time, while cattails stands are retreating. We also found annual variability in the spatial dynamics, suggesting that other factors, such as the effect of weather conditions on water level, may affect population processes. Interspecific interactions had a detrimental effect on both common reed and cattail biomass. However, common reed showed morphological plasticity in shoot height, number of nodes, and internodes length, while cattails did not. Our observations suggest that common reed has a net competitive advantage over cattails in roadside ditches and freshwater marshes. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? [J].
Alpert, P ;
Simms, EL .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) :285-297
[2]   Morphological adaptations of emergent plants to water flow:: a case study with Typha angustifolia, Zizania latifolia and Phragmites australis [J].
Asaeda, T ;
Fujino, T ;
Manatunge, J .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (12) :1991-2001
[3]  
BRADSHAW A. D., 1965, ADVANCE GENET, V13, P115, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60048-6
[4]   Roadside as Invasion Pathway for Common Reed (Phragmites australis) [J].
Brisson, Jacques ;
de Blois, Sylvie ;
Lavoie, Claude .
INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 3 (04) :506-514
[5]  
Callaway RM, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P1115, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1115:PPAIAP]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Choi YD, 2003, NAT AREA J, V23, P320
[8]   Expansion of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (Common Reed) into Typha spp. (Cattail) Wetlands in Northwestern Indiana, USA [J].
Chun, Young-Moon ;
Choi, Young D. .
JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2009, 52 (03) :220-228
[9]   Compensation and plasticity in an invasive plant species [J].
Claridge K. ;
Franklin S.B. .
Biological Invasions, 2002, 4 (4) :339-347
[10]   The effects of litter on growth and plasticity of Phragmites australis clones originating from infertile, fertile or eutrophicated habitats [J].
Clevering, OA .
AQUATIC BOTANY, 1999, 64 (01) :35-50