Asymmetries in social touch-motor and emotional biases on lateral preferences in embracing, cradling and kissing

被引:15
作者
Packheiser, Julian [1 ]
Schmitz, Judith [1 ]
Metzen, Dorothea [1 ]
Reinke, Petunia [1 ]
Radtke, Fiona [1 ]
Friedrich, Patrick [1 ]
Guentuerkuen, Onur [1 ]
Peterburs, Jutta [2 ]
Ocklenburg, Sebastian [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Dept Psychol, Biopsychol, Bochum, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Biol Psychol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Psychol, Essen, Germany
来源
LATERALITY | 2020年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
Social neuroscience; emotion; lateralization; social touch; affective touch; DYNAMIC FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; RIGHT-HEMISPHERE; LEFT-SIDE; SPATIAL ABILITY; TURNING BIAS; HANDEDNESS; INFANT; PERCEPTION; STRESS; DIRECTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1080/1357650X.2019.1690496
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In human social interaction, affective touch plays an integral role to communicate intentions and emotions. Three of the most important forms of social touch are embracing, cradling and kissing. These behaviours have been demonstrated to be lateralized, but the underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. Both motor and emotive biases have been suggested to affect laterality of social touch. We aimed to systematically investigate how motor preferences and emotive biases influence the lateralization of embracing, cradling and kissing within the same sample. Participants performed all three forms of social touch in neutral, positive and negative emotional conditions. Like a previous study, we found a rightward bias for embracing that was modulated by both motor preferences and the emotional content of the situation. Kissing and cradling were not influenced by motor preferences. In general, a negative emotional connotation of the situation led to a reduction of lateral biases in social touch, independent of the individual direction.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 348
页数:24
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [21] Infant holding preferences in maternity hospitals: Testing the hypothesis of the lateralized perception of emotions
    Donnot, Julien
    Vauclair, Jacques
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 32 (03) : 881 - 890
  • [22] VOLUNTARY SMILING CHANGES REGIONAL BRAIN ACTIVITY
    EKMAN, P
    DAVIDSON, RJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (05) : 342 - 345
  • [23] Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization
    Elias, LJ
    Bryden, MP
    Bulman-Fleming, MB
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1998, 36 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [24] An examination of the leftward cradling bias among typically developing adults high on autistic traits
    Fleva, Eleni
    Khan, Azizuddin
    [J]. LATERALITY, 2015, 20 (06): : 711 - 722
  • [25] A comparative perspective on lateral biases and social behavior
    Forrester, Gillian S.
    Todd, Brenda K.
    [J]. CEREBRAL LATERALIZATION AND COGNITION: EVOLUTIONARY AND DEVELOPMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BEHAVIORAL BIASES, 2018, 238 : 377 - 403
  • [26] The left cradling bias: An evolutionary facilitator of social cognition?
    Forrester, Gillian S.
    Davis, Rachael
    Mareschal, Denis
    Malatesta, Gianluca
    Todd, Brenda K.
    [J]. CORTEX, 2019, 118 : 116 - 131
  • [27] Forsell Lena., 2012, Comprehensive Psychology, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.2466/02.17.21.CP.1.13, https://doi.org/10.2466/02.17.21.CP.1.13]
  • [28] Emotional language is all right: Emotional prosody reduces hemispheric asymmetry for linguistic processing
    Godfrey, Hazel K.
    Grimshaw, Gina M.
    [J]. LATERALITY, 2016, 21 (4-6): : 568 - 584
  • [29] Adult persistence of head-turning asymmetry
    Güntürkün, O
    [J]. NATURE, 2003, 421 (6924) : 711 - 711
  • [30] Ontogenesis of Lateralization
    Gunturkun, Onur
    Ocklenburg, Sebastian
    [J]. NEURON, 2017, 94 (02) : 249 - 263