Asymmetries in social touch-motor and emotional biases on lateral preferences in embracing, cradling and kissing

被引:15
作者
Packheiser, Julian [1 ]
Schmitz, Judith [1 ]
Metzen, Dorothea [1 ]
Reinke, Petunia [1 ]
Radtke, Fiona [1 ]
Friedrich, Patrick [1 ]
Guentuerkuen, Onur [1 ]
Peterburs, Jutta [2 ]
Ocklenburg, Sebastian [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Dept Psychol, Biopsychol, Bochum, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Biol Psychol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Psychol, Essen, Germany
来源
LATERALITY | 2020年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
Social neuroscience; emotion; lateralization; social touch; affective touch; DYNAMIC FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; RIGHT-HEMISPHERE; LEFT-SIDE; SPATIAL ABILITY; TURNING BIAS; HANDEDNESS; INFANT; PERCEPTION; STRESS; DIRECTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1080/1357650X.2019.1690496
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In human social interaction, affective touch plays an integral role to communicate intentions and emotions. Three of the most important forms of social touch are embracing, cradling and kissing. These behaviours have been demonstrated to be lateralized, but the underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. Both motor and emotive biases have been suggested to affect laterality of social touch. We aimed to systematically investigate how motor preferences and emotive biases influence the lateralization of embracing, cradling and kissing within the same sample. Participants performed all three forms of social touch in neutral, positive and negative emotional conditions. Like a previous study, we found a rightward bias for embracing that was modulated by both motor preferences and the emotional content of the situation. Kissing and cradling were not influenced by motor preferences. In general, a negative emotional connotation of the situation led to a reduction of lateral biases in social touch, independent of the individual direction.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 348
页数:24
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Adolphs R, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P7678
  • [2] DIFFERENTIAL LATERALIZATION FOR POSITIVE VERSUS NEGATIVE EMOTION
    AHERN, GL
    SCHWARTZ, GE
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1979, 17 (06) : 693 - 698
  • [3] Most adults show opposite-side biases in the imagined holding of infants and objects
    Almerigi, JB
    Carbary, TJ
    Harris, LJ
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2002, 48 (2-3) : 258 - 263
  • [4] Emotional and hemispheric asymmetries in shifts of attention: An ERP study
    Baijal, Shruti
    Srinivasan, Narayanan
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2011, 25 (02) : 280 - 294
  • [5] Impact of stress in childhood: Psychobiological alterations
    Banqueri, Maria
    Mendez, Marta
    Arias, Jorge L.
    [J]. PSICOTHEMA, 2017, 29 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [6] Barnlund D.C., 1989, COMMUNICATIVE STYLES
  • [7] Kissing laterality and handedness
    Barrett, Dianne
    Greenwood, Julian G.
    McCullagh, John F.
    [J]. LATERALITY, 2006, 11 (06): : 573 - 579
  • [8] Borod J.C., 1993, Neuropsychology, V7, P427
  • [9] Right hemisphere emotional perception: Evidence across multiple channels
    Borod, JC
    Cicero, BA
    Obler, LK
    Welkowitz, J
    Erhan, HM
    Santschi, C
    Grunwald, IS
    Agosti, RM
    Whalen, JR
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 12 (03) : 446 - 458
  • [10] When left means right: an explanation of the left cradling bias in terms of right hemisphere specializations
    Bourne, VJ
    Todd, BK
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2004, 7 (01) : 19 - 24