Identifying taxonomic and functional surrogates for spring biodiversity conservation

被引:8
作者
Jyvasjarvi, Jussi [1 ]
Virtanen, Risto [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ilmonen, Jari [4 ]
Paasivirta, Lauri [5 ]
Muotka, Timo [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Dept Ecol & Genet, POB 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Physiol Div, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Deutsch Pl 5e, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Metsahallitus, POB 94, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland
[5] Ruuhikoskenkatu, 17 B 5, FI-20240 Salo, Finland
[6] Univ Oulu, Finnish Environm Inst, Nat Environm Ctr, POB 413, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Asellus aquaticus; Bryum weigelii; complementarity; functional diversity; Macropelopia; Paratrichocladius skirwithensis; taxonomic diversity; BRYOPHYTE COMMUNITIES; TOP PREDATORS; DIVERSITY; UMBRELLA; SELECTION; TAXA; MACROINVERTEBRATE; VERTEBRATES; DISTURBANCE; SHORTCUTS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13101
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Surrogate approaches are widely used to estimate overall taxonomic diversity for conservation planning. Surrogate taxa are frequently selected based on rarity or charisma, whereas selection through statistical modeling has been applied rarely. We used boosted-regression-tree models (BRT) fitted to biological data from 165 springs to identify bryophyte and invertebrate surrogates for taxonomic and functional diversity of boreal springs. We focused on these 2 groups because they are well known and abundant in most boreal springs. The best indicators of taxonomic versus functional diversity differed. The bryophyte Bryum weigelii and the chironomid larva Paratrichocladius skirwithensis best indicated taxonomic diversity, whereas the isopod Asellus aquaticus and the chironomid Macropelopia spp. were the best surrogates of functional diversity. In a scoring algorithm for priority-site selection, taxonomic surrogates performed only slightly better than random selection for all spring-dwelling taxa, but they were very effective in representing spring specialists, providing a distinct improvement over random solutions. However, the surrogates for taxonomic diversity represented functional diversity poorly and vice versa. When combined with cross-taxon complementarity analyses, surrogate selection based on statistical modeling provides a promising approach for identifying groundwater-dependent ecosystems of special conservation value, a key requirement of the EU Water Framework Directive.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 893
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [51] www.freshwaterecology.info - An online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences
    Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid
    Hering, Daniel
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 53 : 271 - 282
  • [52] Top predators and biodiversity
    Sergio, F
    Newton, I
    Marchesi, L
    [J]. NATURE, 2005, 436 (7048) : 192 - 192
  • [53] BRYUM HEDW (BRYACEAE) IN WESTERN NORTH-AMERICA
    SPENCE, JR
    [J]. BRYOLOGIST, 1988, 91 (02) : 73 - 85
  • [54] Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity
    Strecker, Angela L.
    Olden, Julian D.
    Whittier, Joanna B.
    Paukert, Craig P.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 21 (08) : 3002 - 3013
  • [55] Ulvinen T, 2002, FINNISH ENV I REPORT
  • [56] Vieira N.K., 2006, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, V187, P1
  • [57] Diaspore and shoot size as drivers of local, regional and global bryophyte distributions
    Virtanen, Risto
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 23 (06): : 610 - 619
  • [58] Are reports of the death of taxonomy an exaggeration?
    Wheeler, Quentin
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2014, 201 (02): : 370 - 371
  • [59] Complementarity analysis: Mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity
    Williams, P
    Faith, D
    Manne, L
    Sechrest, W
    Preston, C
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 128 (02) : 253 - 264