Simulating emissions intensity targets with energy economic models: algorithm and application

被引:6
作者
Cai, Yiyong [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Yingying [3 ]
Stegman, Alison [2 ]
Newth, David [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere Flagship, Forestry House,Bldg 2, Yarralumla, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, CAMA, JG Crawford Bldg, Acton, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Econ & Management Bldg,99 Shangda Rd, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy economic model; Simulation; Climate policy; Emissions intensity target; POLICY; CHINA; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-015-1927-0
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Pressure on developing economies to make quantifiable emissions reduction commitments has led to the introduction of intensity based emissions targets, where reductions in emissions are specified with reference to some measure of economic output. The Copenhagen commitments of China and India are two prominent examples. Intensity targets substantially increase the complexity of policy simulation and analysis, because a given emissions intensity target could be satisfied with a range of emissions and output combinations. Here, a simple algorithm, the Iterative Method, is proposed for an energy economic model to find a unique policy solution that achieves an emissions intensity target at minimum economic loss. We prove the mathematical properties of the algorithm, and compare its numerical performance with other methods' in the existing literature.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 155
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Ellerman A.D., 2003, Climate Policy, pS7
[2]   The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India [J].
Govindaraju, V. G. R. Chandran ;
Tang, Chor Foon .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 104 :310-318
[3]   Designing an emissions trading scheme for China An up-to-date climate policy assessment [J].
Huebler, Michael ;
Voigt, Sebastian ;
Loeschel, Andreas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 :57-72
[4]   Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty [J].
Jotzo, Frank ;
Pezzey, John C. V. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 38 (02) :259-284
[5]   How does carbon dioxide emission change with the economic development? Statistical experiences from 132 countries [J].
Liao, Hua ;
Cao, Huai-Shu .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (05) :1073-1082
[6]   Emissions intensity targeting: From China's 12th Five Year Plan to its Copenhagen commitment [J].
Lu, Yingying ;
Stegman, Alison ;
Cai, Yiyong .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 61 :1164-1177
[7]   Chinese regional energy efficiency change and its determinants analysis: Malmquist index and Tobit model [J].
Lv, Wendong ;
Hong, Xiaoxin ;
Fang, Kuangnan .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 228 (01) :9-22
[8]   Revisiting the case for intensity targets: Better incentives and less uncertainty for developing countries [J].
Marschinski, Robert ;
Edenhofer, Ottmar .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (09) :5048-5058
[9]   CARBON TAXES AND US FISCAL REFORM [J].
McKibbin, Warwick J. ;
Morris, Adele C. ;
Wilcoxen, Peter J. ;
Cai, Yiyong .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2015, 68 (01) :139-155
[10]   COMPARING CLIMATE COMMITMENTS: A MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE COPENHAGEN ACCORD [J].
McKibbin, Warwick J. ;
Morris, Adele C. ;
Wilcoxen, Peter J. .
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2011, 2 (02) :79-103