Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length

被引:13
|
作者
Choi, Ayoung [1 ]
Kwon, Hyunggoo [1 ]
Jeon, Sohee [1 ]
机构
[1] Keye Eye Ctr, 326 Teheran Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-86604-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 +/- 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 +/- 0.22 D and 0.32 +/- 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 +/- 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P=0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P<0.001), and shorter AXL (P=0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of IOL Calculation Formulas for Long and Short Axial Length Eyes
    Sandhu, Umar
    Hussain, Zain S.
    Griffin, David R.
    Cooke, David L.
    Riaz, Kamran M.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [32] Accuracy of five intraocular lens formulas in eyes with trifocal lens implant
    Malaescu, Monica
    Stanca, Horia T.
    Tabacaru, Bogdana
    Stanila, Adriana
    Stanca, Simona
    Danielescu, Ciprian
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (03) : 2536 - 2543
  • [33] THEORETICAL FORMULAS FOR INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATION
    AFLALO, G
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1987, 10 (04): : 283 - 293
  • [34] Accuracy of Ten Intraocular Lens Formulas in Spherical Equivalent of Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation
    Jingyi Shi
    Zehui Zhu
    Bin Hu
    Shuyi Qian
    Yalan Wang
    Pingjun Chang
    Yun-e Zhao
    Ophthalmology and Therapy, 2024, 13 : 1321 - 1342
  • [35] Accuracy of Ten Intraocular Lens Formulas in Spherical Equivalent of Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation
    Shi, Jingyi
    Zhu, Zehui
    Hu, Bin
    Qian, Shuyi
    Wang, Yalan
    Chang, Pingjun
    Zhao, Yun-e
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (05) : 1321 - 1342
  • [36] New method to assess the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas according to ocular biometric parameters
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel
    Poyales, Francisco
    Burguera, Noemi
    Garzon, Nuria
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (06): : 849 - 856
  • [37] Relative Behavior of Modern IOL Power Calculation Formulas with Regard to Axial Length
    Rossip, Maxwell
    Hastings, Jordan
    Cooke, David
    Pantanelli, Seth
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [38] Measurement of axial length in the calculation of intraocular lens power
    P Sunder Raj
    B Ilango
    Allan Watson
    Eye, 1998, 12 : 227 - 229
  • [39] Measurement of axial length in the calculation of intraocular lens power
    Raj, PS
    Ilango, B
    Watson, A
    EYE, 1998, 12 (2) : 227 - 229
  • [40] A Comparison of the Accuracy of 6 Modern Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas
    Kane, Jack X.
    Connell, Benjamin
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 127 (11) : 1472 - 1486