Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length

被引:13
作者
Choi, Ayoung [1 ]
Kwon, Hyunggoo [1 ]
Jeon, Sohee [1 ]
机构
[1] Keye Eye Ctr, 326 Teheran Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-86604-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 +/- 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 +/- 0.22 D and 0.32 +/- 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 +/- 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P=0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P<0.001), and shorter AXL (P=0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry [J].
Aristodemou, Petros ;
Cartwright, Nathaniel E. Knox ;
Sparrow, John M. ;
Johnston, Robert L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (01) :63-71
[2]   Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas [J].
Cooke, David L. ;
Cooke, Timothy L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (08) :1157-1164
[3]   Intraocular lens power calculations in short eyes using 7 formulas [J].
Gokce, Sabite E. ;
Zeiter, John H. ;
Weikert, Mitchell P. ;
Koch, Douglas D. ;
Hill, Warren ;
Wang, Li .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (07) :892-897
[4]   Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia [J].
Haigis, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (05) :906-911
[5]   Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses [J].
Holladay, JT ;
Gills, JP ;
Leidlein, J ;
Cherchio, M .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :1118-1123
[6]   Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection [J].
Kane, Jack X. ;
Van Heerden, Anton ;
Atik, Alp ;
Petsoglou, Constantinos .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (03) :333-339
[7]   Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer [J].
Kim, Se Young ;
Lee, Seung Hyun ;
Kim, Na Rae ;
Chin, Hee Seung ;
Jung, Ji Won .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01)
[8]   Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: I. Logical approach for classifying IOL calculation formulas [J].
Koch, Douglas D. ;
Hill, Warren ;
Abulafia, Adi ;
Wang, Li .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (06) :717-718
[9]   Visual Performance of a Quadrifocal (Trifocal) Intraocular Lens Following Removal of the Crystalline Lens [J].
Kohnen, Thomas ;
Herzog, Michael ;
Hemkeppler, Eva ;
Schonbrunn, Sabrina ;
De Lorenzo, Nina ;
Petermann, Kerstin ;
Bohm, Myriam .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 184 :52-62
[10]   Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation to Treat Visual Demands in Various Distances Following Lens Removal [J].
Kohnen, Thomas ;
Titke, Christine ;
Boehm, Myriam .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 161 :71-77