Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length

被引:13
|
作者
Choi, Ayoung [1 ]
Kwon, Hyunggoo [1 ]
Jeon, Sohee [1 ]
机构
[1] Keye Eye Ctr, 326 Teheran Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-86604-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 +/- 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 +/- 0.22 D and 0.32 +/- 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 +/- 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P=0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P<0.001), and shorter AXL (P=0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
    Ayoung Choi
    Hyunggoo Kwon
    Sohee Jeon
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [2] Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Formulas Calculated by Biometers with Multiple Refractive Indices According to Axial Length
    Won, Yeo Kyoung
    Yoo, Young-Sik
    Yun, Hee-jee
    Chung, Tae-Young
    Lim, Dong Hui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (22)
  • [3] Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
    Sanchez-Linan, Noelia
    Perez-Rueda, Antonio
    Parron-Carreno, Tesifon
    Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-Jose
    Castro-Luna, Gracia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [4] Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
    Noelia Sánchez-Liñan
    Antonio Pérez-Rueda
    Tesifón Parrón-Carreño
    Bruno-José Nievas-Soriano
    Gracia Castro-Luna
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [5] Predictive value of regression and theoretical IOL formulas in pediatric intraocular lens implantation
    Andreo, LK
    Wilson, ME
    Saunders, RA
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 1997, 34 (04) : 240 - 243
  • [6] Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculations Using the IOLMaster in Eyes with Long Axial Length and a Comparison of Various Formulas
    Bang, Stacy
    Edell, Erica
    Yu, Qilu
    Pratzer, Kim
    Stark, Walter
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (03) : 503 - 506
  • [7] Comparison of intraocular lens power formulas according to axial length after myopic corneal laser refractive surgery
    Whang, Woong-Joo
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Kim, Seon-Ju
    Chung, So-Hyang
    Savini, Giacomo
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (03): : 297 - 303
  • [8] Theoretical Impact of Intraocular Lens Design Variations on the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculations
    Gatinel, Damien
    Debellemaniere, Guillaume
    Saad, Alain
    Rampat, Radhika
    Malet, Jacques
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (10)
  • [9] The accuracy of different generation intraocular lens power formulas in eyes with axial length less than 22 millimeter
    Yildiz, Aydin
    Arikan, Sedat
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 : 210 - 214
  • [10] Comparison of the accuracy of six intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes of axial length exceeding 25.0 mm
    Stopyra, W.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2021, 44 (09): : 1332 - 1339