Doomed peripheral intravenous catheters: Bad Outcomes are similar for emergency department and inpatient placed catheters: A retrospective medical record review

被引:17
作者
Kache, Shawn [1 ]
Patel, Sunny [2 ]
Chen, Nai-Wei [1 ]
Qu, Lihua [1 ]
Bahl, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Beaumont Hosp, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] Cent Michigan Univ, Coll Med, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
Peripheral intravenous catheter failure; dwell time; complications;
D O I
10.1177/1129729820974259
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Introduction: The survivorship of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) placed in hospitalized patients is shockingly poor and leads to frequent reinsertions. We aimed to evaluate differences in failure rates and IV insertion practices for PIVCs that are placed in the emergency department (ED) compared to those placed in the inpatient (IP) setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective electronic medical record review of PIVC survival at a single-site suburban, academic tertiary care referral center with 130,000 annual ED visits and 1100 inpatient beds. Adult patients admitted requiring at least one PIVC were included. The primary outcome was incidence of premature failure of PIVCs. Secondary outcomes included dwell time, completion of therapy, catheter diameter, and site of insertion as they relate to PIVC survival. Results: Between January 2018 and July 2019, 90,743 IV catheters were included from 47,272 unique patient encounters in which 35,798 and 54,945 catheters were placed in the ED and IP units, respectively. There was no significant difference in failure rate between the ED and IP PIVCs, with 53.1% of ED PIVCs failing and 53.4% of IP PIVCs failing (p = 0.35). Mean dwell time for ED PIVCs was 3.4 days compared to a mean of 3.2 days for IP placed PIVCs (p < 0.001). 48% of ED PIVCs achieved completion of therapy at the first insertion compared to 59% of IP PIVCs (p < 0.001). The antecubital fossa and forearm had the lowest failure rate of 53% and 50%, respectively, and 22 gauge PIVCs had the highest failure rate of 60.5%. Conclusion: PIVCs have similar poor survival rates regardless of ED versus IP location of the insertion. The forearm and antecubital fossa sites should be preferentially used. Smaller diameter (22G) catheters have highest complications and poorest survival regardless of site of insertion. Larger diameter catheters (18 or 20 gauge) may offer improved outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 56
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Prospective study of incidence and predictors of peripheral intravenous catheter-induced complications
    Abolfotouh, Mostafa A.
    Salam, Mahmoud
    Bani-Mustafa, Ala'a
    White, David
    Balkhy, Hanan H.
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2014, 10 : 993 - 1001
  • [2] From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department
    Carr, Peter J.
    Rippey, James C. R.
    Cooke, Marie L.
    Higgins, Niall S.
    Trevenen, Michelle
    Foale, Aileen
    Rickard, Claire M.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (10) : 1216 - 1221
  • [3] Phlebitis risk varies by peripheral venous catheter site and increases after 96 hours: a large multi-centre prospective study
    Cicolini, Giancarlo
    Manzoli, Lamberto
    Simonetti, Valentina
    Flacco, Maria Elena
    Comparcini, Dania
    Capasso, Lorenzo
    Di Baldassarre, Angela
    Elfarouki, Ghaleb Eltaji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2014, 70 (11) : 2539 - 2549
  • [4] Position of peripheral venous cannulae and the incidence of thrombophlebitis: an observational study
    Cicolini, Giancarlo
    Bonghi, Antonia Pollidoro
    Di Labio, Luisa
    Di Mascio, Rocco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (06) : 1268 - 1273
  • [5] Factors that affect longevity of intravenous cannulas: a prospective study
    Dillon, M. F.
    Curran, J.
    Martos, R.
    Walsh, C.
    Walsh, J.
    Al-Azawi, D.
    Lee, C. S.
    O'Shea, D.
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 101 (09) : 731 - 735
  • [6] Intravenous Therapy A Review of Complications and Economic Considerations of Peripheral Access
    Dychter, Samuel S.
    Gold, David A.
    Carson, Deborah
    Haller, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2012, 35 (02) : 84 - 91
  • [7] Gorski L., 2016, Journal of Infusion Nursing, V39, DOI DOI 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396
  • [8] Phlebitis rate and time kinetics of short peripheral intravenous catheters
    Grüne, F
    Schrappe, M
    Basten, J
    Wenchel, HM
    Tual, E
    Stützer, H
    [J]. INFECTION, 2004, 32 (01) : 30 - 32
  • [9] Accepted but Unacceptable: Peripheral IV Catheter Failure
    Helm, Robert E.
    Klausner, Jeffrey D.
    Klemperer, John D.
    Flint, Lori M.
    Huang, Emily
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2019, 42 (03) : 151 - 164
  • [10] Observational Study of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Outcomes in Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Multivariable Analysis of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure
    Marsh, Nicole
    Webster, Joan
    Larsen, Emily
    Cooke, Marie
    Mihala, Gabor
    Rickard, Claire M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (02) : 83 - 89