Stochastic simulation of water drainage at the field scale and its application to irrigation management

被引:12
作者
Hu, Kelin
White, Robert
Chen, Deli
Li, Baoguo [1 ]
Li, Weidong
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Resource Management, Fac Land & Food Resources, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Kent State Univ, Dept Geog, Kent, OH 44240 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
field scale; soil saturated hydraulic conductivity; spatial variability; water drainage; stochastic simulation; irrigation management;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2006.12.010
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To estimate water drainage at the field scale, a frequently adopted approach is using a deterministic model with field-averaged hydraulic parameters. However, spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties in the field is a potential source of error. This study evaluated the effect of spatial variability of surface soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (K,) on water drainage. A conditional simulation (CS) method was used to generate a random field of surface soil K. based on 117 observed values in the study area. The random field of surface soil K, was then coupled with a dynamic soil water movement model (HYDRUS-1D). Water drainage during a period of 3 months was stochastically simulated with a total water input of 354 mm (including 270 mm of irrigation). Accumulated drainage beyond 2 in soil depth ranged from 23.7 to 64.7 mm, which accounted for 8.8-24.0% of the irrigation input. In addition, the accumulated drainage was also calculated using the measured K, data and K, estimated by an ordinary kriging (OK) method. Results obtained from the three methods showed that the accumulated quantities of water drainage obtained by the CS method agreed well with those from measured K, data, while the water drainage range was narrowed by the OK method because of its apparent 'smoothing effect'. The effect of spatial variability of surface soil K, on water drainage was demonstrated by the three methods and their results were all better than a traditional method that did not consider the spatial variability of surface soil K,. An irrigation schedule was finally determined using the CS method. When the irrigation input was controlled between 190 and 200 mm, the schedule saved about 747 m(3) of water in a 1 hm(2) field, accounting for about 28% of the traditional irrigation applied, and the mean accumulated quantity of water drainage was only 2.3 mm, far lower than the 58.9 mm generated by the traditional method. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 130
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, TECHNICAL MANUAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], ROSETTA 1 0
[3]  
Cao QiaoHong, 2003, Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, V9, P139
[4]  
deJong R, 1997, CAN J SOIL SCI, V77, P285
[5]  
DEUTSCH CV, 1998, GSLIB GEOSTATISTICAL, P125
[6]   Identification of hydraulic conductivity structure in sand and gravel aquifers: Cape Cod data set [J].
Eggleston, JR ;
Rojstaczer, SA ;
Peirce, JJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (05) :1209-1222
[7]   Accounting for soil spatial autocorrelation in the design of experimental trials [J].
Fagroud, M ;
Van Meirvenne, M .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (04) :1134-1142
[8]   SIMULATION OF FIELD WATER-UPTAKE BY PLANTS USING A SOIL-WATER DEPENDENT ROOT EXTRACTION FUNCTION [J].
FEDDES, RA ;
KOWALIK, P ;
KOLINSKAMALINKA, K ;
ZARADNY, H .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1976, 31 (1-2) :13-26
[9]   FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL-STRUCTURE AND ITS IMPACT ON CROP GROWTH AND NITRATE LEACHING IN THE ANALYSIS OF FERTILIZING SCENARIOS [J].
FINKE, PA .
GEODERMA, 1993, 60 (1-4) :89-107
[10]  
Goovaerts P., 1997, GEOSTATISTICS NATURA