Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in elderly patients: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:5
|
作者
Bae, SungA [1 ]
Kim, Yongcheol [1 ]
Gogas, Bill D. [2 ]
Kim, Min Chul [1 ]
Sim, Doo Sun [1 ]
Hong, Young Joon [1 ]
Kim, Ju Han [1 ]
Ahn, Youngkeun [1 ]
Jeong, Myung Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Hosp 1, Spencer B King III Catheterizat Lab, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
drug-eluting stent; bare-metal stent; elderly; clinical trials; clinical research; BARE-METAL STENTS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; ARTERY-DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; UNCOATED STENTS; OUTCOMES; VALIDATION; INSIGHTS; OLDER;
D O I
10.5603/CJ.a2019.0109
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Current guidelines recommend newer generation drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ischemic heart disease. However, there is no age-specific recommendation in elderly patients. Methods: Meta-analysis was performed of 6 randomized studies enrolling 5,042 elderly patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation (DES, n = 2,579; BMS, n = 2,463). Results: Combined data indicated a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) with use of DES (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.71, p < 0.001). Moreover, use of DES was associated with a significantly lower incidence of myocardial infarction (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.81, p = 0.003) and repeat revascularization (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.62, p < 0.001), was compared to that with the use of BMS. Stent thrombosis and bleeding complication rates were not significantly different between groups. In a subgroup meta-analysis, short duration (1 or 6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with a significantly lower MACE rate (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.80; p = 0.003) in elderly patients who underwent PCI with everolimus-eluting stent implantation, compared with that using long duration DAPT. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides clinically relevant evidence that DES rather than BMS should be selected for elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent vs. contemporary durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bavishi, Chirag
    Chugh, Yashasvi
    Kimura, Takeshi
    Natsuaki, Masahiro
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Gordon, Paul
    Aronow, Herbert D.
    Abbott, Jinnette Dawn
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2020, 6 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [22] Safety and efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents: An updated meta-analysis and regression of 9 randomized clinical trials
    Mahmoud, Ahmed N.
    Shah, Nikhil H.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Agarwal, Nayan
    Elgendy, Akram Y.
    Mentias, Amgad
    Barakat, Amr F.
    Mahtta, Dhruv
    Anderson, R. David
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (01) : 151 - 158
  • [23] Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stenting: meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Ndrepepa, Gjin
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Fusaro, Massimiliano
    Kastrati, Adnan
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 104 (10) : 887 - 901
  • [24] Nobori Biolimus-Eluting Stent vs. Permanent Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Danzi, Gian Battista
    Piccolo, Raffaele
    Galasso, Gennaro
    Piscione, Federico
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (08) : 1858 - +
  • [25] Safety and efficacy of degradable vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of 18,395 patients from randomized trials
    Wang, Yuqing
    Liu, Shijian
    Luo, Yuanlin
    Wang, Fangjuan
    Liu, Huanyun
    Li, Lufeng
    Zhao, Xiaohui
    Huang, Lan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 173 (01) : 100 - 109
  • [26] Bioresorbable scaffolds vs. drug-eluting stents for patients with myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Liu, Yong
    Xiao, Di
    Wu, Yang
    Li, Meng
    Liu, Jia
    Zhuang, Rui
    Ma, Liyong
    Li, Jingen
    Zhang, Lijing
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [27] Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis of 8 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gao, Shen
    Shen, Jing
    Mukku, Venkata Kishore
    Wang, Mei Jia
    Akhtar, Muzina
    Liu, Wei
    ANGIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (07) : 612 - 621
  • [28] Effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents in vein grafts: A meta-analysis Response
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Joyal, Dominique
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 160 (02) : E11 - E11
  • [29] Comparison of efficacy and safety between ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and thin durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Zhai, Zhen-yu
    Li, Ju-xiang
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2019, 30 (08) : 590 - 599
  • [30] Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Zhu, Ping
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhang, Chenliang
    Li, Huakang
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Song, Zhiyuan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 18