Hygiene monitoring in poultry meat production - Use of bioluminescence ATP assay

被引:0
|
作者
Ellerbroek, L [1 ]
Dam-Lu, NL [1 ]
Krause, P [1 ]
Weise, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Bundesinst Gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz & V, Fachbereich Hyg Lebensmittel & Bedarfsgegenstande, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT | 1998年 / 78卷 / 05期
关键词
poultry meat production; ATP; bioluminescence; microbiological guidelines; bacterial contamination;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
A bioluminescence ATP assay for hygiene monitoring in poultry meat production was evaluated using 232 samples. To obtain the bacterial ATP level and colony forming units (CFU) of poultry 25 cm(2) poultry breast skin and 10 g poultry neck skin samples were examined. Samples were excised during the slaughter process: (1) before the body was opened, (2) immediately after evisceration, (3) after the carcass entered the inside-outside-body-washer, (4) before the carcass entered the air-chilling room and (5) immediately after the carcass left the air-chilling room (before carcass weight classification). Additionally, at 4 degrees C, aerobically stored carcasses were investigated on the 3rd, 4th and 7th day after slaughter, respectively. From all samples, ATP was assayed and total viable counts (psychrotrophic and mesotrophic bacteria), Pseudomonadaceae, Aeromonas and Enterobacteriaceae were obtained by drop plating method. The detection limit for the ATP-bioluminescence method for mesotrophic bacterial ranged from log 3.5 to 4.5 CFU/cm(2) in poultry breast skin. Using samples from neck skin the correlation coefficient of 0.51 was calculated between the ATP assay and the amount of total viable counts. For poultry breast skin, the overall correlation coefficient was calculated as 0.86. According to our results the ATP bioluminescence method is to be recommended for detection of total microbial load in poultry within the framework of internal hygiene monitoring. In the evaluated premises as mentioned above microbiological guideline for total bacterial counts 3.8 log10 CFU/25cm(2) and for Enterobacteriaceae 1.7 log10 CFU/25cm(2) are to be recommended. An RLU value of log 1.8 is equivalent to these microbiological guidelines for monitoring the poultry production process.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / +
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ATP-Bioluminescence and Conventional Microbiology for Hygiene Evaluation of Cutting Room Surfaces in Poultry Slaughterhouse
    Rodrigues, Laura Beatriz
    dos Santos, Luciana Ruschel
    Rizzo, Natalie Nadin
    Ferreira, Daiane
    de Oliveira, Amauri Picollo
    Levandowski, Rafael
    Webber, Bruna
    do Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro
    ACTA SCIENTIAE VETERINARIAE, 2018, 46
  • [22] QUESTIONNAIRE ON POULTRY MEAT HYGIENE
    MACPHERSON, I
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1976, 98 (22) : 451 - 451
  • [23] Adenylate kinase amplification of ATP bioluminescence for hygiene monitoring in the food and beverage industry
    Corbitt, AJ
    Bennion, N
    Forsythe, SJ
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 30 (06) : 443 - 447
  • [24] SALMONELLA INFECTION AND MEAT HYGIENE - POULTRY MEAT
    WATSON, WA
    BROWN, JM
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1975, 96 (16) : 351 - 353
  • [25] CHANGES IN THE HYGIENE REGULATION FOR MEAT AND POULTRY MEAT
    BOROWKA, J
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1992, 72 (07): : 983 - &
  • [26] CHANGES IN THE HYGIENE REGULATIONS FOR MEAT AND POULTRY MEAT
    BOROWKA, J
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1992, 72 (08): : 1112 - 1118
  • [27] STABILITY OF REAGENTS FOR USE IN AN AUTOMATED ATP BIOLUMINESCENCE ASSAY SYSTEM
    SPIEGEL, SJ
    TIFFT, EC
    ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1977, 78 (02) : 586 - 588
  • [28] THE USE OF HACCP IN THE PRODUCTION OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS
    TOMPKIN, RB
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1990, 53 (09) : 795 - 803
  • [29] Evaluation of two methods for monitoring surface cleanliness - ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing
    Food Safety Research Group, Colchester Avenue Campus, Univ. of Wales Institute Cardiff, Colchester Avenue, Cardiff CF3 7XR, United Kingdom
    不详
    Lumin., 1 (33-38):
  • [30] IMPLEMENTATION OF POULTRY MEAT HYGIENE REGULATIONS
    EDWARDS, WA
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1994, 134 (15) : 396 - 396