The Relationship between Building Agents in the Context of Integrated Project Management: A Prospective Analysis

被引:6
作者
Cerezo-Narvaez, Alberto [1 ]
Pastor-Fernandez, Andres [1 ]
Otero-Mateo, Manuel [1 ]
Ballesteros-Perez, Pablo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cadiz, Dept Mech Engn & Ind Design, Puerto Real 11519, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Engn Projects, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
building agents; building sector; prospective analysis; strategic planning; stakeholder analysis; integrated project management; CONSTRUCTION PROJECT; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS FACTORS; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; ACTORS; MODEL; SCENARIOS; FORESIGHT; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.3390/buildings11050184
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The increasing complexity of building projects, with high quality standards, integrated technologies and strong management restrictions, demands the intervention of numerous and diverse specialists. This requires an intense leadership, organization and coordination effort. However, building regulations, such as the Spanish Law on Building Management (LOE) 38/1999, only formally consider developers, project designers, project and work supervisors, quality control entities, construction companies, owners and final users as building agents. However, these categories are insufficient to represent the interests of all the stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to carry out an analysis of the agents that are currently part of the entire building process. If their relationship of influence and dependence, as well as their alignment with the overall objectives of the project are studied, potential convergences, divergences, agreements and disagreements can be established. To do this, the authors conducted a prospective analysis through the MACTOR (Matrix of Alliances and Conflicts: Tactics, Objectives and Recommendations) strategic planning simulation tool, for which the rules of the Delphi technique were applied and a consultation with technical experts, both professionals and academics, was held. The research provides insight to assess the power relationships between the building agents, as well as to measure the alignment of objectives with their interests. Results show that, in the context of integrated project management (IPM), the influence of technical agents is reduced by limiting their functions to those marked by their regulatory framework, allowing them to focus on their legal powers, and the room for manoeuvre of the professional agents, who are subject to systematized monitoring and control, is also reduced. The prospective analysis also highlights the importance of defining the scope from its early stages, as well as the need to reach multilateral agreements based on the other two main constraints: time and cost.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Afshari A., 2012, Scientific Research and Essays, V7, P2927, DOI [DOI 10.5897/SRE11.1295, 0.5897/SRE11.1295]
  • [2] Ahadzie D. K., 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.006
  • [3] Alashwal AM, 2017, CONSTR ECON BUILD, V17, P62, DOI 10.5130/AJCEB.v17i2.5319
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, HDB METHODOLOGICAL A
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, Project Management Body of Knowledge: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge 6aEdition. Project Management Journal
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, DYNA MANAG
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2009, FUTURES RES METHODOL
  • [8] Analysis of the causality links between the growth of the construction industry and the growth of the macroeconomy in Ghana
    Asomanin Anaman, Kwabena
    Osei-Amponsah, Charity
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 25 (09) : 951 - 961
  • [9] Editorial: stakeholder management in construction
    Atkin, Brian
    Skitmore, Martin
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (06) : 549 - 552
  • [10] Incorporating the effect of weather in construction scheduling and management with sine wave curves: application in the United Kingdom
    Ballesteros-Perez, Pablo
    Smith, Stefan Thor
    Lloyd-Papworth, Josephine Gwen
    Cooke, Peter
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 36 (12) : 666 - 682