Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for sacroiliac joint pain: A prospective, randomized, sham-controlled short-term trial

被引:12
|
作者
Moon, Young Eun [1 ]
Seok, Hyun [2 ]
Kim, Sang-Hyun [2 ]
Lee, Seung Yeol [2 ]
Yeo, Jung Ho [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Bucheon, South Korea
关键词
Sacroiliac joint pain; extracorporeal shock wave; numeric rating scale; PROVOCATION TESTS; HIGH-ENERGY; FOLLOW-UP; ESWT; TENDINITIS; SHOULDER; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.3233/BMR-150405
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain can cause lower back pain and pelvic discomfort. However, there is no established standard treatment for SIJ pain. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a novel, non-invasive therapeutic modality for musculoskeletal disorders. The mechanism underlying shockwave therapy is not fully understood, but the frequency with which ESWT is applied clinically has increased over the years. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of using ESWT to treating SIJ pain. METHODS: Thirty patients with SIJ pain were assigned randomly to ESWT (n = 15) and sham control (n = 15) groups. The ESWT group received 2,000 shockwaves with energy set to the maximum level tolerable by the patient (energy density = 0.090.25 mJ/mm(2)). The probe was oriented perpendicular to the posterior SIJ line, and moved up and down along the joint line. The sham control group received 2,000 shockwaves with the probe oriented parallel to the posterior SIJ line. A 10-cm numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were assessed before the intervention, and 1 and 4 weeks post-intervention. Participants were instructed to refrain from using any other conservative treatment, including anti-inflammatory medication and other physical modalities during the study. RESULTS: In the ESWT group, NRS decreased significantly at post-treatment week 4 (3.64 (95% confidence interval, 2.29-4.99)) compared to baseline (6.42 (5.19-7.66); P < 0.05). ODI improved at 1 and 4 weeks compared to baseline, but not significantly. In the sham group, NRS and ODI did not differ at any post-treatment time point. There was a significant group difference in NRS at week 4 post-treatment (3.64 (2.29-4.99) in the ESWT group vs. 6.18 (5.34-7.02) in the sham control group; P < 0.05), but this was not the case for ODI. CONCLUSIONS: ESWT represents a potential therapeutic option for decreasing SIJ pain.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 784
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Pilot Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Detrusor Underactivity/Underactive Bladder
    Shen, Yuan Chi
    Chen, Chien Hsu
    Chancellor, Michael B.
    Chuang, Yao-Chi
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (03): : 524 - 530
  • [42] Supervised Exercises Compared With Radial Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy for Subacromial Shoulder Pain: 1-Year Results of a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Engebretsen, Kaia
    Grotle, Margreth
    Bautz-Holter, Erik
    Ekeberg, Ole Marius
    Juel, Niels Gunnar
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 91 (01): : 37 - 47
  • [43] Immediate Effects of Ankle Joint Mobilization With Movement on Postural Control, Range of Motion, and Muscle Strength in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Tomruk, Murat
    Tomruk, Melda Soysal
    Alkan, Emrullah
    Gelecek, Nihal
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2020, 29 (08) : 1060 - 1068
  • [44] The clinical utility of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for burn pruritus: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study
    Joo, So Young
    Cho, Yoon Soo
    Seo, Cheong Hoon
    BURNS, 2018, 44 (03) : 612 - 619
  • [45] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy vs. Corticosteroid Local Injection in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
    ElGendy, Mohamed H.
    Mazen, Mohamed M.
    Saied, Ahmed Mostafa
    ElMeligie, Mohamed M.
    Aneis, Yasser
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2023, 102 (06) : 533 - 540
  • [46] Capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency at 448 kHz plus exercising versus exercising alone for subacromial pain: A sham-controlled randomized clinical trial
    Avendano-Coy, Juan
    Aceituno-Gomez, Javier
    Garcia-Duran, Sandra
    Arroyo-Fernandez, Ruben
    Blazquez-Gamallo, Raquel
    Garcia-Madero, Venancio Miguel
    Escriba-de-la-Fuente, Sara Maruxa
    Fernandez-Perez, Cristina
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (11) : 1450 - 1462
  • [47] High- versus low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy of rotator cuff tendinopathy : A prospective, randomised, controlled study
    Schofer, Markus Dietmar
    Hinrichs, Frank
    Peterlein, Christian Dominik
    Arendt, Melanie
    Schmitt, Jan
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2009, 75 (04): : 452 - 458
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for upper limb tendonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiong, Yongqing
    Wen, Tianshan
    Jin, Songzhi
    Lin, Ling
    Shao, Qianer
    Peng, Yue
    Zheng, Qining
    Li, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [49] Comparison of the efficiency of peloidotherapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapies in patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Koru, Hasan
    Yilmaz, Halim
    Yilmaz, Ramazan
    Karpuz, Savas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2024, 68 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [50] Effect of Radial Shock Wave Therapy for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Wu, Yung-Tsan
    Ke, Ming-Jen
    Chou, Yu-Ching
    Chang, Chih-Ya
    Lin, Ching-Yueh
    Li, Tsung-Ying
    Shih, Feng-Mei
    Chen, Liang-Cheng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (06) : 977 - +